OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our preliminary experience using diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted MRI with single-shot echo-planar technique at b values of 50, 300, 500, 700, and 1,000 s/mm2 was prospectively performed on 23 patients with chronic hepatitis and on seven healthy volunteers. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in four locations in the liver. Liver biopsy results (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed by two hepatopathologists in consensus to determine stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ADCs between patients classified with respect to having stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage or less 2 fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in prediction of the presence of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis. RESULTS: Using a b value of 500 s/mm2 and all combined b values, we found significantly lower hepatic ADCs in stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis. The mean ADCs (x 10(-3) mm2/s) with all b values were 1.47 +/- 0.11 (SD) versus 1.65 +/- 0.10 for stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001) and 1.44 +/- 0.07 versus 1.66 +/- 0.10 for stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis (p <0.001). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis, with areas under the curve of 0.896 and 0.896, sensitivity of 83.3% and 88.9%, and specificity of 83.3% and 80.0% (ADC with all b values, 1.54-1.53 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less). CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MRI can be used for prediction of the presence of moderate and advanced liver fibrosis.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our preliminary experience using diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted MRI with single-shot echo-planar technique at b values of 50, 300, 500, 700, and 1,000 s/mm2 was prospectively performed on 23 patients with chronic hepatitis and on seven healthy volunteers. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured in four locations in the liver. Liver biopsy results (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed by two hepatopathologists in consensus to determine stage of fibrosis and grade of inflammation. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ADCs between patients classified with respect to having stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage or less 2 fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in prediction of the presence of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis. RESULTS: Using a b value of 500 s/mm2 and all combined b values, we found significantly lower hepatic ADCs in stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis and stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis. The mean ADCs (x 10(-3) mm2/s) with all b values were 1.47 +/- 0.11 (SD) versus 1.65 +/- 0.10 for stage 2 or greater versus stage 1 or less fibrosis (p < 0.001) and 1.44 +/- 0.07 versus 1.66 +/- 0.10 for stage 3 or greater versus stage 2 or less fibrosis (p <0.001). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage 2 or greater and stage 3 or greater fibrosis, with areas under the curve of 0.896 and 0.896, sensitivity of 83.3% and 88.9%, and specificity of 83.3% and 80.0% (ADC with all b values, 1.54-1.53 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less). CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MRI can be used for prediction of the presence of moderate and advanced liver fibrosis.
Authors: Lan Lu; Bernadette Erokwu; Gregory Lee; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Katherine M Dell; Chris A Flask Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: E E Sigmund; G Y Cho; S Kim; M Finn; M Moccaldi; J H Jensen; D K Sodickson; J D Goldberg; S Formenti; L Moy Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Krishna Juluru; Andrew H Talal; Rhonda K Yantiss; Pascal Spincemaille; Elizabeth K Weidman; Ashley E Giambrone; Sadaf Jalili; Steven P Sourbron; Jonathan P Dyke Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hadrien A Dyvorne; Nicola Galea; Thomas Nevers; M Isabel Fiel; David Carpenter; Edmund Wong; Matthew Orton; Andre de Oliveira; Thorsten Feiweier; Marie-Louise Vachon; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 11.105