Literature DB >> 23053714

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: usefulness of ADC values in the differential diagnosis of focal lesions and effect of ROI methods on ADC measurements.

João Pedro Filipe1, Luís Curvo-Semedo, João Casalta-Lopes, Maria Cristina Marques, Filipe Caseiro-Alves.   

Abstract

OBJECT: By measuring the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver parenchyma and focal hepatic lesions (FHL) we proposed to investigate the utility of ADC in the differential diagnosis of hepatic disease and to determine the influence of region of interest (ROI) characteristics in those measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients with at least one supracentimetric FHL, or parenchymal abnormality, were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis was based on histopathologic data or, alternatively, on a combination of consensus between imaging methods and 24 months of follow-up. Ninety lesions were evaluated with respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted imaging (b values: 50 and 700 s/mm(2)): 14 hepatocellular carcinomas, 18 metastases, 10 focal nodular hyperplasias, four adenomas, 30 hemangiomas and 14 cysts. ADC of hepatic parenchyma was measured by placing ROIs in four different segments, and in FHLs by using three circular 1 cm(2) ROIs and one ROI encompassing the full lesion. Data was statistically analyzed (p < 0.05 considered significant), and a receiver operating characteristic curve was assessed to evaluate the accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy.
RESULTS: Our measurements showed that parenchyma ADC was significantly higher in segment II and that ADCs of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions (p < 0.001). There was significant overlap between benign solid lesions and malignant lesions and the area under the curve for malignancy was 0.939 (sensitivity 89.7 %, specificity 90.6 %), using a cutoff of 1.43 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s. No significant difference was found between ROIs of different characteristics.
CONCLUSION: ADC measurements can help to characterize FHLs and differentiate normal from pathological parenchyma. Any ROI above 1 cm(2) can provide accurate ADC measurements in homogenous lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053714     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-012-0348-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  42 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver.

Authors:  Petra G Kele; Eric J van der Jagt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The role of functional MR imaging in the assessment of tumor response after chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ihab R Kamel; David A Bluemke; John Eng; Eleni Liapi; Wells Messersmith; Diane K Reyes; Jean-Francois H Geschwind
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Evaluating local hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence post-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: is diffusion-weighted MRI reliable as an indicator?

Authors:  Satoshi Goshima; Masayuki Kanematsu; Hiroshi Kondo; Ryujiro Yokoyama; Yusuke Tsuge; Yoshimune Shiratori; Minoru Onozuka; Noriyuki Moriyama
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; David J Collins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Tejas Parikh; Stephen J Drew; Vivian S Lee; Samson Wong; Elizabeth M Hecht; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Influence of cardiac motion on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Tetsu Niwa; Marko K Ivancevic; Gwenael Herigault; Marc Van Cauteren; Peter R Luijten
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Harsh Kandpal; Raju Sharma; K S Madhusudhan; Kulwant Singh Kapoor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function.

Authors:  Denis Le Bihan; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  17 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted echo planar MR imaging of the neck at 3 T using integrated shimming: comparison of MR sequence techniques for reducing artifacts caused by magnetic-field inhomogeneities.

Authors:  Sergios Gatidis; Hansjörg Graf; Jakob Weiß; Alto Stemmer; Berthold Kiefer; Konstantin Nikolaou; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Petros Martirosian
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Role of diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient and correlation with hepatobiliary phase findings in the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Riccardo Inchingolo; Anna Maria De Gaetano; Davide Curione; Marzia Ciresa; Luca Miele; Maurizio Pompili; Fabio Maria Vecchio; Felice Giuliante; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Re: Baseline and Early MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantification as a Predictor of Response of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Doxorubicin Drug-Eluting Bead Chemoembolization.

Authors:  Fabrizio Chegai; Stefano Merolla; Laura Greco; Marco Nezzo; Lorenzo Mannelli; Antonio Orlacchio
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Estimation of optimal b-value sets for obtaining apparent diffusion coefficient free from perfusion in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kishor Karki; Geoffrey D Hugo; John C Ford; Kathryn M Olsen; Siddharth Saraiya; Robert Groves; Elisabeth Weiss
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Scan time minimization in hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of the simultaneous multislice acceleration technique with different acceleration factors and gradient preparation schemes.

Authors:  Jana Taron; Petros Martirosian; Nina F Schwenzer; Michael Erb; Thomas Kuestner; Jakob Weiß; Ahmed Othman; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christina Schraml
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  DWI/ADC in Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Focal Liver Lesion.

Authors:  Elma Jahic; Amela Sofic; Azra Husic Selimovic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-07-16

7.  Could ADC values be a promising diagnostic criterion for differentiating malignant and benign hepatic lesions in Asian populations: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Jing-Jin Li; Jiang Li; He-Wen Li; Guo-Ping Xu; Rong-Rong Jia; Xue-Ning Zhang; Yang Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Apparent diffusion coefficient normalization of normal liver: Will it improve the reproducibility of diffusion-weighted imaging at different MR scanners as a new biomarker?

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Jie Zhang; Jia-Yin Gao; Jin-Ning Li; Da-Wei Yang; Min Chen; Cheng Zhou; Zheng-Han Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farhad Nalaini; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Seyedeh Maryam Mousavinezhad; Ali Ansari; Mohammadgharib Salehi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Diffusion weighted MR and apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in classification and characterization of noncystic focal liver lesions: does a clinical role exist?

Authors:  Francesco Mungai; Mario Morone; Alberta Villanacci; Maria Pia Bondioni; Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni; Luigi Grazioli; Stefano Colagrande
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.