Literature DB >> 12511671

Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients.

Bachir Taouli1, Valérie Vilgrain, Erik Dumont, Jean-Luc Daire, Bo Fan, Yves Menu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To (a) evaluate liver diffusion isotropy, (b) compare two diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions by using two or four b values, and (c) determine an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) threshold value to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients were examined with two single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR sequences. In the first sequence, liver diffusion isotropy was evaluated by using diffusion gradients in three directions with two b values. In the second sequence, a unidirectional diffusion gradient was used with four b values. ADCs were measured in 43 patients with 52 focal hepatic lesions more than 1 cm in diameter and in 23 patients with 14 normal and nine cirrhotic livers and were compared by using nonparametric tests.
RESULTS: Diffusion in the liver parenchyma was isotropic. ADCs of focal hepatic lesions were significantly different between sequences (P <.01). The mean (+/- SD) ADCs in the first sequence were 0.94 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.60 for metastases, 1.33 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.13 for HCCs, 1.75 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.46 for benign hepatocellular lesions, 2.95 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.67 for hemangiomas, and 3.63 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.56 for cysts. There was a significant difference between benign (2.45 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.96, isotropic value) and malignant (1.08 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.50) lesions (P <.01 for both sequences).
CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging can help differentiate benign from malignant hepatic lesions. The use of two b values in one direction could be sufficient for the design of MR sequences in the liver. Copyright RSNA, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12511671     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2261011904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  132 in total

1.  Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumour is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Keiichiro Nakamura; Ikuo Joja; Junichi Kodama; Atsushi Hongo; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Diffusion-prepared fast imaging with steady-state free precession (DP-FISP): a rapid diffusion MRI technique at 7 T.

Authors:  Lan Lu; Bernadette Erokwu; Gregory Lee; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Katherine M Dell; Chris A Flask
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Concepción González Hernando; Laura Esteban; Teresa Cañas; Enrique Van den Brule; Miguel Pastrana
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  The diffusion-weighted imaging perfusion fraction f is a potential marker of sorafenib treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maïté Lewin; Laetitia Fartoux; Alexandre Vignaud; Lionel Arrivé; Yves Menu; Olivier Rosmorduc
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Aftab Alam Khan
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xing-Yu Cui; Hong-Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging: Review of imaging techniques and overview of liver imaging.

Authors:  Santhi Maniam; Janio Szklaruk
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-28

8.  Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Nickolas Papanikolaou; Spyros Yarmenitis; Thomas Maris; Apostolos Karantanas; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  An acetone-based phantom for quantitative diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Xiaoke Wang; Scott B Reeder; Diego Hernando
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Imaging of liver cancer.

Authors:  Ben Ariff; Claire R Lloyd; Sameer Khan; Mohamed Shariff; Andrew V Thillainayagam; Devinder S Bansi; Shahid A Khan; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Adrian K P Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.