Literature DB >> 17174915

Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth.

James Frederick Charles Windmill1, Joseph Curt Jackson, Elizabeth Jane Tuck, Daniel Robert.   

Abstract

Many night-flying insects evolved ultrasound sensitive ears in response to acoustic predation by echolocating bats . Noctuid moths are most sensitive to frequencies at 20-40 kHz , the lower range of bat ultrasound . This may disadvantage the moth because noctuid-hunting bats in particular echolocate at higher frequencies shortly before prey capture and thus improve their echolocation and reduce their acoustic conspicuousness . Yet, moth hearing is not simple; the ear's nonlinear dynamic response shifts its mechanical sensitivity up to high frequencies. Dependent on incident sound intensity, the moth's ear mechanically tunes up and anticipates the high frequencies used by hunting bats. Surprisingly, this tuning is hysteretic, keeping the ear tuned up for the bat's possible return. A mathematical model is constructed for predicting a linear relationship between the ear's mechanical stiffness and sound intensity. This nonlinear mechanical response is a parametric amplitude dependence that may constitute a feature common to other sensory systems. Adding another twist to the coevolutionary arms race between moths and bats, these results reveal unexpected sophistication in one of the simplest ears known and a novel perspective for interpreting bat echolocation calls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17174915     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  16 in total

1.  Nocturnal activity positively correlated with auditory sensitivity in noctuoid moths.

Authors:  Hannah M ter Hofstede; John M Ratcliffe; James H Fullard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Time-resolved tympanal mechanics of the locust.

Authors:  J F C Windmill; S Bockenhauer; D Robert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  No neural evidence for dynamic auditory tuning of the A1 receptor in the ear of the noctuid moth, Noctua pronuba.

Authors:  Navdeep S Asi; James Howard Fullard; Scott Whitehead; Jeff W Dawson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Synchrony through twice-frequency forcing for sensitive and selective auditory processing.

Authors:  Joseph C Jackson; James F C Windmill; Victoria G Pook; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Extremely high frequency sensitivity in a 'simple' ear.

Authors:  Hannah M Moir; Joseph C Jackson; James F C Windmill
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Frank Macías-Escrivá; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Active amplification in insect ears: mechanics, models and molecules.

Authors:  Natasha Mhatre
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Noise-induced hearing loss: new animal models.

Authors:  Kevin W Christie; Daniel F Eberl
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Possibilities offered by implantable miniaturized cuff-electrodes for insect neurophysiology.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Thilo B Krüger; Thomas Stieglitz
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.