Literature DB >> 19720966

Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients.

Sarah T Hawley1, Jennifer J Griggs, Ann S Hamilton, John J Graff, Nancy K Janz, Monica Morrow, Reshma Jagsi, Barbara Salem, Steven J Katz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the association between patient decision involvement and surgery received among racially and ethnically diverse patients or patients' attitudes about surgery and the role of family and friends in surgical treatment choices.
METHODS: Women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer from June 2005 through February 2007 and reported to the Los Angeles or Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were mailed a survey after diagnosis (N = 3133). Latina and African American women were oversampled. The response rate was 72.4%. The analytic sample (N = 1651) excluded those with stage IIIA or higher disease, self-reported clinical contraindications to breast-conserving surgery with radiation, and unclear race or ethnicity. The dependent variable was receipt of mastectomy initially. The primary independent variables were patient involvement in decision making, race or ethnicity, attitudes about recurrence, the effects of radiation, the impact of surgery on body image, and the role of others in decision making. Latinas were categorized as low or high acculturated. The association between patient involvement in decision making and the receipt of mastectomy was evaluated using logistic regression while controlling for other independent variables. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: The analytic sample was 23.9% Latina (12.0% low acculturated, 11.9% high acculturated), 27.1% African American, and 48.9% white, and 17.2% received a mastectomy initially. For each racial or ethnic group, more women who reported a patient-based decision received mastectomy than those who reported a shared or surgeon-based decision (P = .022 for low-acculturated Latinas, P < .001 for other groups). Women who reported that concerns about recurrence or radiation effects were very important in their surgery decision were more likely to receive mastectomy than those less concerned (for recurrence concerns, estimated relative risk [RR] = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 2.10; for radiation concerns, estimated RR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.88 to 2.85). Women who reported that body image concerns and their spouse's opinion were very important in their surgery decision less often received mastectomy than those less concerned about body image or who placed less weight on their spouse's opinion (for body image concerns, estimated RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.74; for spouse's opinion, estimated RR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.78).
CONCLUSION: Greater patient involvement in decision making was associated with receipt of mastectomy for all racial and ethnic groups. Patient attitudes about surgery and the opinions of family and friends contribute to surgical choices made by women with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19720966      PMCID: PMC2758308          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  46 in total

Review 1.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  What is the impact of shared decision making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer?

Authors:  Jeanne Mandelblatt; Barbara Kreling; Melissa Figeuriedo; Shibao Feng
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Edward Guadagnoli; Mary Beth Landrum; Catherine Borbas; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Angela Fagerlin; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Latina patient perspectives about informed treatment decision making for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; Jennifer J Griggs; Amy K Alderman; Mahasin Mujahid; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11

7.  From policy to patients and back: surgical treatment decision making for patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Breast surgery in the 'Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination' (ATAC) trial: American women are more likely than women from the United Kingdom to undergo mastectomy.

Authors:  Gershon Y Locker; J Richard Sainsbury; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Concordance between patients' desired and actual decision-making roles in breast cancer care.

Authors:  Barbara A Vogel; Almut W Helmes; Annette Hasenburg
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy?

Authors:  E Dale Collins; Caroline P Moore; Kate F Clay; Stephen A Kearing; Annette M O'Connor; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Richard J Barth; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Natasha M Rueth; Andrea Abbott; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Ethnic differences in the caregiver's attitudes and preferences about the treatment and care of advanced lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Amy Y Zhang; Stephen J Zyzanski; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Karen Sepucha; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Meghan E Meyer; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Mehra Golshan; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Paul Abrahamse; Monica Morrow; Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer J Griggs; John J Graff; Ann S Hamilton; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Lisa Newman; Jennifer J Griggs; Mary Ann Kosir; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Emerging trends in surgical and adjuvant radiation therapies among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Oyewale O Shiyanbola; Brian L Sprague; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Sally Herschorn; Ronald E Gangnon; Donald L Weaver; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Measuring the quality of surgical decisions for Latina breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen Sepucha; Sandra Feibelmann; Yuchiao Chang; Sarah Hewitt; Argyrios Ziogas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Cultural challenges to engaging patients in shared decision making.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.