Literature DB >> 19717632

Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies.

Mi Zhou1, Emma Hernandez-Sanabria, Le Luo Guan.   

Abstract

Cattle with high feed efficiencies (designated "efficient") produce less methane gas than those with low feed efficiencies (designated "inefficient"); however, the role of the methane producers in such difference is unknown. This study investigated whether the structures and populations of methanogens in the rumen were associated with differences in cattle feed efficiencies by using culture-independent methods. Two 16S rRNA libraries were constructed using approximately 800-bp amplicons generated from pooled total DNA isolated from efficient (n = 29) and inefficient (n = 29) animals. Sequence analysis of up to 490 randomly selected clones from each library showed that the methanogenic composition was variable: less species variation (22 operational taxonomic units [OTUs]) was detected in the rumens of efficient animals, compared to 27 OTUs in inefficient animals. The methanogenic communities in inefficient animals were more diverse than those in efficient ones, as revealed by the diversity indices of 0.84 and 0.42, respectively. Differences at the strain and genotype levels were also observed and found to be associated with feed efficiency in the host. No difference was detected in the total population of methanogens, but the prevalences of Methanosphaera stadtmanae and Methanobrevibacter sp. strain AbM4 were 1.92 (P < 0.05) and 2.26 (P < 0.05) times higher in inefficient animals, while Methanobrevibacter sp. strain AbM4 was reported for the first time to occur in the bovine rumen. Our data indicate that the methanogenic ecology at the species, strain, and/or genotype level in the rumen may play important roles in contributing to the difference in methane gas production between cattle with different feed efficiencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19717632      PMCID: PMC2765141          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02815-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Integration of microbial ecology and statistics: a test to compare gene libraries.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Bret R Larget; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew J Williams; Barbara Winder; Claus T Christophersen; Sharon L Rodgers; Kellie D Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Molecular identification of methanogenic archaea from sheep in Queensland, Australia reveal more uncultured novel archaea.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew F Toovey; Carolyn L Pimm
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.331

4.  Advantage of using inosine at the 3' termini of 16S rRNA gene universal primers for the study of microbial diversity.

Authors:  Eitan Ben-Dov; Orr H Shapiro; Nachshon Siboni; Ariel Kushmaro
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency.

Authors:  Le Luo Guan; Joshua D Nkrumah; John A Basarab; Stephen S Moore
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Phylogenetic analysis of archaea in three fractions of cow rumen based on the 16S rDNA sequence.

Authors:  Eun Chule Shin; Byoung Rock Choi; Woo Jin Lim; Su Young Hong; Chang Long An; Kye Man Cho; Young Kyun Kim; Jin Mee An; Jung Mi Kang; Sung Sill Lee; Hoon Kim; Han Dae Yun
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.331

7.  Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen.

Authors:  M F Whitford; R M Teather; R J Forster
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Xuanli Ma; Nestor E Obispo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  16S rDNA directed PCR primers and detection of methanogens in the bovine rumen.

Authors:  L C Skillman; P N Evans; C Strömpl; K N Joblin
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.858

View more
  82 in total

1.  Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle.

Authors:  Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Zhiquan Wang; Obioha N Durunna; Stephen S Moore; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Buccal swabbing as a noninvasive method to determine bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic microbial community structures in the rumen.

Authors:  Sandra Kittelmann; Michelle R Kirk; Arjan Jonker; Alan McCulloch; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Diet alters both the structure and taxonomy of the ovine gut microbial ecosystem.

Authors:  Melinda J Ellison; Gavin C Conant; Rebecca R Cockrum; Kathy J Austin; Huan Truong; Michela Becchi; William R Lamberson; Kristi M Cammack
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 5.  Microbial fuel cells and microbial ecology: applications in ruminant health and production research.

Authors:  Orianna Bretschger; Jason B Osterstock; William E Pinchak; Shun'ichi Ishii; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Methanogen prevalence throughout the gastrointestinal tract of pre-weaned dairy calves.

Authors:  Mi Zhou; Yanhong Chen; Philip J Griebel; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014

Review 7.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Rumen methanogenic genotypes differ in abundance according to host residual feed intake phenotype and diet type.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; Sinéad M Waters; Sinead M Waters; David A Kenny; Christopher J Creevey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Taxonomic Identification of Ruminal Epithelial Bacterial Diversity during Rumen Development in Goats.

Authors:  Jinzhen Jiao; Jinyu Huang; Chuanshe Zhou; Zhiliang Tan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Methanogens and methanogenesis in the rumens and ceca of lambs fed two different high-grain-content diets.

Authors:  M Popova; D P Morgavi; C Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.