Literature DB >> 23241983

Methanogens and methanogenesis in the rumens and ceca of lambs fed two different high-grain-content diets.

M Popova1, D P Morgavi, C Martin.   

Abstract

The amount and nature of dietary starch are known to influence the extent and site of feed digestion in ruminants. However, how starch degradability may affect methanogenesis and methanogens along the ruminant's digestive tract is poorly understood. This study examined the diversity and metabolic activity of methanogens in the rumen and cecum of lambs receiving wheat or corn high-grain-content diets. Methane production in vivo and ex situ was also monitored. In vivo daily methane emissions (CH(4) g/day) were 36% (P < 0.05) lower in corn-fed lambs than in wheat-fed lambs. Ex situ methane production (μmol/h) was 4-fold higher for ruminal contents than for cecal contents (P < 0.01), while methanogens were 10-fold higher in the rumen than in the cecum (mcrA copy numbers; P < 0.01). Clone library analysis indicated that Methanobrevibacter was the dominant genus in both sites. Diet induced changes at the species level, as the Methanobrevibacter millerae-M. gottschalkii-M. smithii clade represented 78% of the sequences from the rumen of wheat-fed lambs and just about 52% of the sequences from the rumen of the corn-fed lambs. Diet did not affect mcrA expression in the rumen. In the cecum, however, expression was 4-fold and 2-fold lower than in the rumen for wheat- and corn-fed lambs, respectively. Though we had no direct evidence for compensation of reduced rumen methane production with higher cecum methanogenesis, the ecology of methanogens in the cecum should be better considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23241983      PMCID: PMC3592211          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03115-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  34 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill.

Authors:  Philip E Luton; Jonathan M Wayne; Richard J Sharp; Paul W Riley
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew J Williams; Barbara Winder; Claus T Christophersen; Sharon L Rodgers; Kellie D Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effect of environmental factors and influence of rumen and hindgut biogeography on bacterial communities in steers.

Authors:  Gustavo A Romero-Pérez; Kim H Ominski; Tim A McAllister; Denis O Krause
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Attempted induction of reductive acetogenesis into the rumen fermentation in vitro.

Authors:  D I Demeyer; D Fiedler; K G De Graeve
Journal:  Reprod Nutr Dev       Date:  1996

7.  Experimental feed induction of ruminal lactic, propionic, or butyric acidosis in sheep.

Authors:  A Lettat; P Nozière; M Silberberg; D P Morgavi; C Berger; C Martin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Xuanli Ma; Nestor E Obispo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Comparative studies of microbial populations in the rumen, duodenum, ileum and faeces of lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  J C Frey; A N Pell; R Berthiaume; H Lapierre; S Lee; J K Ha; J E Mendell; E R Angert
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil.

Authors:  C Martin; J Rouel; J P Jouany; M Doreau; Y Chilliard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  22 in total

1.  Changes in the Rumen Microbiota of Cows in Response to Dietary Supplementation with Nitrate, Linseed, and Saponin Alone or in Combination.

Authors:  Milka Popova; Jessie Guyader; Mathieu Silberberg; Ahmad Reza Seradj; Cristina Saro; Aurélien Bernard; Christine Gérard; Cécile Martin; Diego P Morgavi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Methanogen prevalence throughout the gastrointestinal tract of pre-weaned dairy calves.

Authors:  Mi Zhou; Yanhong Chen; Philip J Griebel; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014

3.  Examination of the rumen bacteria and methanogenic archaea of wild impalas (Aepyceros melampus melampus) from Pongola, South Africa.

Authors:  Laura M Cersosimo; Hannah Lachance; Benoit St-Pierre; Wouter van Hoven; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Diet Supplementation With Sulfur Amino Acids Modulated Fermentation Metabolome and Gut Microbiome in Goats.

Authors:  Tsegay Teklebrhan; Zhiliang Tan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  MAP, Johne's disease and the microbiome; current knowledge and future considerations.

Authors:  Chloe Matthews; Paul D Cotter; Jim O' Mahony
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2021-05-07

6.  Dietary wheat and reduced methane yield are linked to rumen microbiome changes in dairy cows.

Authors:  Keith W Savin; Peter J Moate; S R O Williams; Carolyn Bath; Joanne Hemsworth; Jianghui Wang; Doris Ram; Jody Zawadzki; Simone Rochfort; Benjamin G Cocks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Toward the identification of methanogenic archaeal groups as targets of methane mitigation in livestock animalsr.

Authors:  Benoit St-Pierre; Laura M Cersosimo; Suzanne L Ishaq; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Diversity and community composition of methanogenic archaea in the rumen of Scottish upland sheep assessed by different methods.

Authors:  Timothy J Snelling; Buğra Genç; Nest McKain; Mick Watson; Sinéad M Waters; Christopher J Creevey; R John Wallace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep.

Authors:  Sandra Kittelmann; Cesar S Pinares-Patiño; Henning Seedorf; Michelle R Kirk; Siva Ganesh; John C McEwan; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bacteria and methanogens differ along the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese roe deer (Capreolus pygargus).

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; Zhigang Zhang; Chao Xu; Jingbo Zhao; Hanlu Liu; Zhongyuan Fan; Fuhe Yang; André-Denis G Wright; Guangyu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.