Literature DB >> 19716265

Bar charts enhance Bland-Altman plots when value ranges are limited.

Mark W Smith1, Jun Ma, Randall S Stafford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A common form of validation study compares alternative methods for collecting data. The Bland-Altman plot pairs observations across methods and plots their mean values vs. their difference. This method provides only limited information, however, when the range of observed values is small relative to the number of observations. This brief report shows how adding a simple bar chart to a Bland-Altman plot adds essential additional information. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: The methodological approach is illustrated using data from a randomized controlled clinical trial of patients in a U.S. county health system.
RESULTS: When the number of unique values is small, a Bland-Altman plot alone may provide inadequate information. Adding a bar chart yields new and essential information about agreement, bias, and heteroscedasticity.
CONCLUSION: Studies validating one data-collection method against another can be performed successfully even when the number of unique values is small. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19716265      PMCID: PMC2818014          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records.

Authors:  P L Ritter; A L Stewart; H Kaymaz; D S Sobel; D A Block; K R Lorig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy.

Authors:  Aman Bhandari; Todd Wagner
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Implementation of case management to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in the Stanford and San Mateo Heart to Heart randomized controlled trial: study protocol and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Ky-Van Lee; Kathy Berra; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 7.327

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of ankle arthrometry to stress ultrasound imaging in the assessment of ankle laxity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Leah Sisson; Theodore Croy; Susan Saliba; Jay Hertel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Shoulder muscle endurance: the development of a standardized and reliable protocol.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Bryan Ma; Joy C Macdermid; Linda J Woodhouse
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-01-11

3.  Pitfalls in the statistical examination and interpretation of the correspondence between physician and patient satisfaction ratings and their relevance for shared decision making research.

Authors:  Oliver Hirsch; Heidemarie Keller; Christina Albohn-Kühne; Tanja Krones; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Absolute and relative reliability of pain sensitivity and functional outcomes of the affected shoulder among women with pain after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  G H F Rasmussen; M Kristiansen; M Arroyo-Morales; M Voigt; P Madeleine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  High adherence to national IPC guidelines as key to sustainable VRE control in Swiss hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Stephan Harbarth; Andreas Widmer; Danielle Vuichard-Gysin; Rami Sommerstein; Andreas Kronenberg; Niccolò Buetti; Marcus Eder; Vanja Piezzi; Céline Gardiol; Matthias Schlegel
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  How Accurate are Recalls of Self-Weighing Frequency? Data from a 24-Month Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Melissa M Crane; Kara Gavin; Julian Wolfson; Jennifer A Linde
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.002

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.