PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) may aid the assessment of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury after lateral ankle sprains by allowing the clinician to visualize and measure talocrural laxity. Comparison of US against another objective method of ankle laxity assessment, such as ankle arthrometry (AA), is needed. The purpose was to evaluate the relationship between the ATFL length measurements measured from stress US images to the inversion and anterior drawer displacement measured with AA in healthy subjects. METHODS: This descriptive laboratory study included 26 ankles from healthy subjects. The apparent length of the ATFL was measured using US during anterior drawer (USAD) and inversion (USINV) stress and the translation of the talocrural joint was measured using AA during anterior drawer (AAAD) and inversion (AAINV) stress. Percent change in length for USAD and USINV were quantified. Intraclass correlation coefficients and pearson product moment correlations Bland-Altman limits of agreement were calculated between relevant variables. RESULTS: USAD and USINV percent change in length were positively correlated (r = .76). Bland Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of 5.38 mm (95% CI: -3.5 to 12 mm) with the AAAD producing higher values than the USAD. No significant correlations were found between the US and AA variables, however the absolute AAAD and AAINV variables were also positively correlated (r = .61). CONCLUSIONS: The US and AA variables were not directly correlated when measuring inversion and anterior laxity in healthy ankles. Differences between the devices that may affect this include different rates of joint loading, patient position and method of assessing laxity. The AA results demonstrated greater anterior displacement. Results may differ in ankle injured subjects who may demonstrate increases in anteroposterior and inversion laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Exploratory study in healthy cohort.
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography (US) may aid the assessment of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury after lateral ankle sprains by allowing the clinician to visualize and measure talocrural laxity. Comparison of US against another objective method of ankle laxity assessment, such as ankle arthrometry (AA), is needed. The purpose was to evaluate the relationship between the ATFL length measurements measured from stress US images to the inversion and anterior drawer displacement measured with AA in healthy subjects. METHODS: This descriptive laboratory study included 26 ankles from healthy subjects. The apparent length of the ATFL was measured using US during anterior drawer (USAD) and inversion (USINV) stress and the translation of the talocrural joint was measured using AA during anterior drawer (AAAD) and inversion (AAINV) stress. Percent change in length for USAD and USINV were quantified. Intraclass correlation coefficients and pearson product moment correlations Bland-Altman limits of agreement were calculated between relevant variables. RESULTS: USAD and USINV percent change in length were positively correlated (r = .76). Bland Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of 5.38 mm (95% CI: -3.5 to 12 mm) with the AAAD producing higher values than the USAD. No significant correlations were found between the US and AA variables, however the absolute AAAD and AAINV variables were also positively correlated (r = .61). CONCLUSIONS: The US and AA variables were not directly correlated when measuring inversion and anterior laxity in healthy ankles. Differences between the devices that may affect this include different rates of joint loading, patient position and method of assessing laxity. The AA results demonstrated greater anterior displacement. Results may differ in ankle injured subjects who may demonstrate increases in anteroposterior and inversion laxity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Exploratory study in healthy cohort.
Authors: D P Fessell; G M Vanderschueren; J A Jacobson; R Y Ceulemans; A Prasad; J G Craig; J A Bouffard; K K Shirazi; M T van Holsbeeck Journal: Radiographics Date: 1998 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: John E Kovaleski; Phillip M Norrell; Robert J Heitman; J Marcus Hollis; Albert W Pearsall Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Tricia J Hubbard; Thomas W Kaminski; Robert A Vander Griend; John E Kovaleski Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jae Ho Cho; Doo Hyung Lee; Hyung Keun Song; Joon Young Bang; Kyung Tai Lee; Young Uk Park Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Kyung Tai Lee; Young Uk Park; Hyuk Jegal; Jong Won Park; Jung Pil Choi; Jin Su Kim Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Markus Wenning; Dominic Gehring; Thomas Lange; David Fuerst-Meroth; Paul Streicher; Hagen Schmal; Albert Gollhofer Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 2.362