Literature DB >> 19714798

Effects of white-to-white diameter and anterior chamber depth on implantable collamer lens vault and visual outcome.

Je Hyun Seo1, Mee Kum Kim, Won Ryang Wee, Jin Hak Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and white-to-white (WTW) diameter on vault in eyes with implantable collamer lenses (ICL V4, STAAR Surgical AG) and to evaluate the effect of vault on visual outcomes and other biometric changes.
METHODS: Twenty-eight eyes of 16 patients who underwent ICL implantation were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups (A1, A2) according to preoperative ACD (> or = 3.3 mm and < 3.3 mm, respectively), two groups (B1, B2) based on WTW diameter (> or = 11.55 mm and < 11.55 mm, respectively), and two groups (C1, C2) according to the difference of ICL diameter and sulcus length (> or = 0.25 mm and < 0.25 mm, respectively). Vault, endothelial cell density, and visual performance were compared between each set of groups. Correlations of vault with WTW diameter, ACD, and diametric difference of the ICL from the sulcus were analyzed.
RESULTS: The high ACD and WTW groups showed significantly higher vaults (0.59 +/- 0.32 mm and 0.57 +/- 0.36 mm, respectively) than the low ACD and WTW groups (0.26 +/- 0.17 mm and 0.25 +/- 0.14 mm, respectively; P = .01 and .01), whereas the differences of diameter between the sulcus and ICL were not related to significant vault differences. The WTW diameter wascorrelated more closely to the vault than the ACD or sulcus diameter (r = 0.70, P < .001), whereas the vault difference did not affect visual quality or endothelial cell density.
CONCLUSIONS: A high WTW diameter or ACD is likely to render a high vault, regardless of any difference in the ICL and sulcus diameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19714798     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090707-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of myopic corneal diameter with the Orbscan II Topography System.

Authors:  Yi Zha; Wangqiang Feng; Xiaohui Han; Jianqiu Cai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The best choice for low and moderate myopia patients incapable for corneal refractive surgery: implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens.

Authors:  Qin Wang; Lina Fan; Qizhi Zhou
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 3.  Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens.

Authors:  Mark Packer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-09

4.  Comparison of early changes in and factors affecting vault following posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation without and with a central hole (ICL V4 and ICL V4c).

Authors:  Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Rajeev Krishnan Naidu; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Analysis of pre-operative factors affecting range of optimal vaulting after implantation of 12.6-mm V4c implantable collamer lens in myopic eyes.

Authors:  Hun Lee; David Sung Yong Kang; Jin Young Choi; Byoung Jin Ha; Eung Kweon Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Short-time evaluation on intraocular scattering after implantable collamer lens implantation for correcting high myopia.

Authors:  Zhe Yu; Jun Li; Hui Song
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia.

Authors:  Xiaojian He; Lingling Niu; Huamao Miao; Feng Zhao; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Confounding sizing in posterior chamber phakic lens selection due to white-to-white measurement bias.

Authors:  JoaquIn Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Ana Tauste; Elisa Hueso; David P Piñero
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Commentary: Reliability of different biometric measurements in implantable collamer lense procedure.

Authors:  Hariprasad V Hebri; Ramya Nayak; Roopashree Rao
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.969

10.  Comparison of the Orbscan II topographer and the iTrace aberrometer for the measurements of keratometry and corneal diameter in myopic patients.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Xiaobo Xia
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.