Literature DB >> 25503356

A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques.

Shwan Mohamad1, Imran Khan2, S Y Hey3, S S Musheer Hussain4.   

Abstract

A systematic review to study the skin complications associated with the bone-anchored hearing aid in relation to surgical techniques. The following databases have been searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library , Google scholar and the PubMed. The literature search date was from January 1977 until November 2013. Randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies were included. Initial search identified 420 publications. Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria of this review. The most common surgical techniques identified were full-thickness skin graft, Dermatome and linear incision techniques. The result shows that dermatome technique is associated with higher rate of skin complications when compared to linear incision and skin graft techniques. Based on the available literature, the use of a linear incision technique appears to be associated with lower skin complications; however, there is limited data available supporting this. Higher quality studies would allow a more reliable comparison between the surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Hearing aids; Prosthesis and implants

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25503356     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3436-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  R A Reyes; A Tjellström; G Granström
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome.

Authors:  Joacim Stalfors; Anders Tjellström
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Osseointegrated implants in the management of childhood ear abnormalities: with particular emphasis on complications.

Authors:  Hisham Zeitoun; Ranit De; Stuart D Thompson; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Surgical experience with bone-anchored hearing aids in children.

Authors:  B C Papsin; T K Sirimanna; D M Albert; C M Bailey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  A one-stage surgical procedure for placement of percutaneous implants for the bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  E A Mylanus; C W Cremers
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory.

Authors:  D Gillett; J W Fairley; T S Chandrashaker; A Bean; J Gonzalez
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Bone-anchored hearing aid: a comparison of surgical techniques.

Authors:  Raymond van de Berg; Robert J Stokroos; Janny R Hof; Michelene N Chenault
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Nijmegen results with application of a bone-anchored hearing aid in children: simplified surgical technique.

Authors:  Maarten J F de Wolf; Myrthe K S Hol; Patrick L M Huygen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids.

Authors:  Ruwan Kiringoda; Lawrence R Lustig
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions.

Authors:  Hubert T Faber; Maarten J F de Wolf; Jacky W J de Rooy; Myrthe K S Hol; Cor W R J Cremers; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-08
View more
  14 in total

1.  Minimal Reporting Standards for Active Middle Ear Hearing Implants.

Authors:  Hannes Maier; Uwe Baumann; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Dirk Beutner; Marco D Caversaccio; Thomas Keintzel; Martin Kompis; Thomas Lenarz; Astrid Magele; Torsten Mewes; Alexander Müller; Tobias Rader; Torsten Rahne; Sebastian P Schraven; Burkard Schwab; Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Bernd Strauchmann; Ingo Todt; Thomas Wesarg; Barbara Wollenberg; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Long-term soft tissue outcomes for hydroxyapatite-coated bone-anchored hearing implant surgery.

Authors:  Todd Kanzara; Hussein Walijee; Rashid Badar Sheikh; Andrew Lau; Robert Temple
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Complications of Transcutaneous Protheses - A Systematic Review of Publications Over the Past 10 Years.

Authors:  Marcos Antonio de Souza; Santiago Luis Vallejos Riart; Stephanie Rugeri de Souza; Rubens de Brito; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Steven J H Bom; Stefan Zwerver; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing.

Authors:  Ivo J Kruyt; Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Cytokine expression profile in the bone-anchored hearing system: 12-week results from a prospective randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Tim George Ate Calon; Joost van Tongeren; Omar Omar; Martin Lars Johansson; Robert-Jan Stokroos
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.932

8.  Three-Year Clinical and Audiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Implants for Bone Conduction Devices: Comparison Between Tissue Preservation Technique and Tissue Reduction Technique.

Authors:  Ivo J Kruyt; Herman Kok; Arjan Bosman; Rik Chrétien Nelissen; Emmanuel Antonia Maria Mylanus; Myrthe Karianne Sofie Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Louise V Straatman; Tim G A Calon; Martin L Johansson; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Herbert van den Berge; Mariette Wagenaar; Edwin Eichhorn; Miranda Janssen; Sofia Jonhede; Joost van Tongeren; Marcus Holmberg; Robert Stokroos
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Review of Bone Conduction Hearing Devices.

Authors:  Susan E Ellsperman; Emily M Nairn; Emily Z Stucken
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.