Literature DB >> 24913737

Soft tissue reactions in patients with bone anchored hearing aids.

J Rebol1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To establish the incidence and correlation between the degree of soft tissue reaction and the body mass index (BMI) according to age and gender after a bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implant.
METHODS: We did a 1-9-year follow-up for the all the patients who underwent surgery in our department with BAHA implant system. Soft tissue reactions were classified in accordance with the Holgers classification on regular patient visits. BMI was calculated for each patient, and changes were recorded at least once a year.
RESULTS: 47 patients were evaluated. 58% were operated on for chronic otitis with mixed or conductive hearing loss; 20% had unilateral or bilateral atresia and 16% had single sided deafness (SSD); other indications were otosclerosis and syndromic patients. The grade of Holgers classification significantly correlated at a 0.001 level with BMI (Spearmans rho 0.452). Holgers grade also differed significantly between the sexes-skin reactions in females were less frequent. An ANOVA test did not reveal any statistical difference between patients with dissimilar indications for BAHA.
CONCLUSION: If performed carefully, BAHA surgery produces a favorable outcome. The Holgers grade may change as time passes. If skin reactions appear, they can be treated through local or systemic therapy, and they may turn into a normal grade. Adipose patients should be treated with special care because they are more prone to soft tissue reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913737     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-014-1151-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  R A Reyes; A Tjellström; G Granström
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Results and complications of the Baha system (bone-anchored hearing aid).

Authors:  G Ricci; A Della Volpe; M Faralli; F Longari; M Gullà; N Mansi; A Frenguelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  K M Holgers; A Tjellström; L M Bjursten; B E Erlandsson
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1988-01

4.  How we do it: Frequency of skin necrosis after BAHA surgery.

Authors:  A Tjellström; G Granström
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Malou Hultcrantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Biofilm formation on bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  P Monksfield; I L C Chapple; J B Matthews; M M Grant; O Addison; A P Reid; D W Proops; R L Sammons
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 7.  Overweight is risking fate. Definition, classification, prevalence, and risks.

Authors:  G A Bray
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  The importance of patients' nutritional status in wound healing.

Authors:  L Russell
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2001-03

9.  Histologic evaluation of soft tissue integration of experimental abutments for bone anchored hearing implants using surgery without soft tissue reduction.

Authors:  Anna Larsson; Stina Wigren; Marcus Andersson; Gunnar Ekeroth; Mark Flynn; Ulf Nannmark
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Experience with the longer (8.5 mm) abutment for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Peter Monksfield; Eu Chin Ho; Andrew Reid; David Proops
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  3 in total

1.  Percutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Is It Clinically Useful in Korean?

Authors:  Sung Min Koh; Young Sang Cho; Ga-Young Kim; Mini Jo; Hye Yoon Seol; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.354

2.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Steven J H Bom; Stefan Zwerver; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Martin L Johansson; Tim G A Calon; Omar Omar; Furqan A Shah; Margarita Trobos; Peter Thomsen; Robert J Stokroos; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.