Literature DB >> 19707702

Longitudinal changes in femur bone mineral density after spinal cord injury: effects of slice placement and peel method.

S Dudley-Javoroski1, R K Shields.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Surveillance of femur metaphysis bone mineral density (BMD) decline after spinal cord injury (SCI) may be subject to slice placement error of 2.5%. Adaptations to anti-osteoporosis measures should exceed this potential source of error. Image analysis parameters likewise affect BMD output and should be selected strategically in longitudinal studies.
INTRODUCTION: Understanding the longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after spinal cord injury (SCI) is important when assessing new interventions. We determined the longitudinal effect of SCI on BMD of the femur metaphysis. To facilitate interpretation of longitudinal outcomes, we (1) determined the BMD difference associated with erroneous peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) slice placement, and (2) determined the effect of operator-selected pQCT peel algorithms on BMD.
METHODS: pQCT images were obtained from the femur metaphysis (12% of length from distal end) of adult subjects with and without SCI. Slice placement errors were simulated at 3 mm intervals and were processed in two ways (threshold-based vs. concentric peel).
RESULTS: BMD demonstrated a rapid decline over 2 years post-injury. BMD differences attributable to operator-selected peel methods were large (17.3% for subjects with SCI).
CONCLUSIONS: Femur metaphysis BMD declines after SCI in a manner similar to other anatomic sites. Concentric (percentage-based) peel methods may be most appropriate when special sensitivity is required to detect BMD adaptations. Threshold-based methods may be more appropriate when asymmetric adaptations are observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19707702      PMCID: PMC2875776          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1044-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  33 in total

1.  Secular change in long bone length and proportion in the United States, 1800-1970.

Authors:  L M Jantz; R L Jantz
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Extremity fractures of patients with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  A E COMARR; R H HUTCHINSON; E BORS
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Does 12 weeks of regular standing prevent loss of ankle mobility and bone mineral density in people with recent spinal cord injuries?

Authors:  Marsha Ben; Lisa Harvey; Sophie Denis; Joanne Glinsky; Gerlinde Goehl; Shane Chee; Robert D Herbert
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Thresholding technique for accurate analysis of density and geometry in QCT, pQCT and microCT images.

Authors:  T N Hangartner
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Longitudinal study of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, the forearm and the lower extremities after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; H H Bohr; O P Schaadt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.686

6.  Bone mineral density after spinal cord injury: a reliable method for knee measurement.

Authors:  Richard K Shields; Janet Schlechte; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Bradley D Zwart; Steven D Clark; Susan A Grant; Vicki M Mattiace
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Bilateral asymmetries in clinical measures of lower-extremity anatomic characteristics.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Anh-Dung Nguyen
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Bone steady-state is established at reduced bone strength after spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).

Authors:  Angela Frotzler; Markus Berger; Hans Knecht; Prisca Eser
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Fracture rates and risk factors for fractures in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P Vestergaard; K Krogh; L Rejnmark; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Asymmetric bone adaptations to soleus mechanical loading after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  S Dudley-Javoroski; R K Shields
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.041

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Bone Imaging and Fracture Risk after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Bone loss at the distal femur and proximal tibia in persons with spinal cord injury: imaging approaches, risk of fracture, and potential treatment options.

Authors:  C M Cirnigliaro; M J Myslinski; M F La Fountaine; S C Kirshblum; G F Forrest; W A Bauman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Active-resisted stance modulates regional bone mineral density in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Measuring muscle and bone in individuals with neurologic impairment; lessons learned about participant selection and pQCT scan acquisition and analysis.

Authors:  L M Giangregorio; J C Gibbs; B C Craven
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bone architecture adaptations after spinal cord injury: impact of long-term vibration of a constrained lower limb.

Authors:  S Dudley-Javoroski; M A Petrie; C L McHenry; R E Amelon; P K Saha; R K Shields
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Turning Over the Hourglass.

Authors:  Richard K Shields
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2017-10-01

7.  High dose compressive loads attenuate bone mineral loss in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  S Dudley-Javoroski; P K Saha; G Liang; C Li; Z Gao; R K Shields
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The mechanical consequence of actual bone loss and simulated bone recovery in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer; Karen L Troy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Bone mineral and stiffness loss at the distal femur and proximal tibia in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W B Edwards; T J Schnitzer; K L Troy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Regional cortical and trabecular bone loss after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.