Sandra J Shultz1, Anh-Dung Nguyen. 1. Applied Neuromechanics Research Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify side-to-side differences in lower-extremity anatomic characteristics, and to compare the magnitude of left-right differences with the measurement error for each variable. DESIGN: : Descriptive. SETTING: Applied neuromechanics research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred healthy participants (50 male, 50 females). ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: One examiner measured 14 anatomic characteristics on the left and right lower extremities. The value on the left was subtracted from value on the right, and 68% (+/-1 SD) and 95% (+/-1.96 SD) confidence intervals were constructed around the mean differences, respectively. These values were compared with the examiner's absolute measurement error for each measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Total leg length, pelvic angle, hip anteversion, standing and supine quadriceps angle, tibiofemoral angle, knee laxity, genu recurvatum, femur and tibia length, tibial torsion, rearfoot angle, and navicular drop. RESULTS: Left-right differences in pelvic angle, tibial torsion, and navicular drop exceeded the measurement error in more than 32% of the cases. Five to thirty-two percent of the cases had left-right differences exceeding the measurement error for hip anteversion, standing and supine quadriceps angle, tibiofemoral angle, knee laxity, genu recurvatum, and femur length. Asymmetries in limb length were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral asymmetries exist in many clinical alignment characteristics, indicating that measurements taken on one limb may not be representative of the contralateral limb. We recommend measuring both extremities when anatomic characteristics are included as part of preseason screenings and prospective study designs to ensure valid comparison.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify side-to-side differences in lower-extremity anatomic characteristics, and to compare the magnitude of left-right differences with the measurement error for each variable. DESIGN: : Descriptive. SETTING: Applied neuromechanics research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred healthy participants (50 male, 50 females). ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: One examiner measured 14 anatomic characteristics on the left and right lower extremities. The value on the left was subtracted from value on the right, and 68% (+/-1 SD) and 95% (+/-1.96 SD) confidence intervals were constructed around the mean differences, respectively. These values were compared with the examiner's absolute measurement error for each measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Total leg length, pelvic angle, hip anteversion, standing and supine quadriceps angle, tibiofemoral angle, knee laxity, genu recurvatum, femur and tibia length, tibial torsion, rearfoot angle, and navicular drop. RESULTS: Left-right differences in pelvic angle, tibial torsion, and navicular drop exceeded the measurement error in more than 32% of the cases. Five to thirty-two percent of the cases had left-right differences exceeding the measurement error for hip anteversion, standing and supine quadriceps angle, tibiofemoral angle, knee laxity, genu recurvatum, and femur length. Asymmetries in limb length were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral asymmetries exist in many clinical alignment characteristics, indicating that measurements taken on one limb may not be representative of the contralateral limb. We recommend measuring both extremities when anatomic characteristics are included as part of preseason screenings and prospective study designs to ensure valid comparison.
Authors: Jeffrey B Taylor; Hsin-Min Wang; Randy J Schmitz; Christopher K Rhea; Scott E Ross; Sandra J Shultz Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Nazlı Tümer; Vahid Arbabi; Willem Paul Gielis; Pim A de Jong; Harrie Weinans; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor Journal: J Anat Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 2.610