Literature DB >> 24190426

Bone mineral and stiffness loss at the distal femur and proximal tibia in acute spinal cord injury.

W B Edwards1, T J Schnitzer, K L Troy.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Computed tomography and finite element modeling were used to assess bone mineral and stiffness loss at the knee following acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Marked bone mineral loss was observed from a combination of trabecular and endocortical resorption. Reductions in stiffness were 2-fold greater than reductions in integral bone mineral.
INTRODUCTION: SCI is associated with a rapid loss of bone mineral and an increased rate of fragility fracture. The large majority of these fractures occur around regions of the knee. Our purpose was to quantify changes to bone mineral, geometry, strength indices, and stiffness at the distal femur and proximal tibia in acute SCI.
METHODS: Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and patient-specific finite element analysis were performed on 13 subjects with acute SCI at serial time points separated by a mean of 3.5 months (range 2.6-4.8 months). Changes in bone mineral content (BMC) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) were quantified for integral, trabecular, and cortical bone at epiphyseal, metaphyseal, and diaphyseal regions of the distal femur and proximal tibia. Changes in bone volumes, cross-sectional areas, strength indices and stiffness were also determined.
RESULTS: Bone mineral loss was similar in magnitude at the distal femur and proximal tibia. Reductions were most pronounced at epiphyseal regions, ranging from 3.0 % to 3.6 % per month for integral BMC (p < 0.001) and from 2.8 % to 3.4 % per month (p < 0.001) for integral vBMC. Trabecular BMC decreased by 3.1-4.4 %/month (p < 0.001) and trabecular vBMD by 2.7-4.7 %/month (p < 0.001). A 3.8-5.4 %/month reduction was observed for cortical BMC (p < 0.001); the reduction in cortical vBMD was noticeably lower (0.6-0.8 %/month; p ≤ 0.01). The cortical bone loss occurred primarily through endosteal resorption, and reductions in strength indices and stiffness were some 2-fold greater than reductions in integral bone mineral.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for therapeutic interventions targeting both trabecular and endocortical bone mineral preservation in acute SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24190426     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2557-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  30 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors in the appearance of heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P Bravo-Payno; A Esclarin; T Arzoz; O Arroyo; C Labarta
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1992-10

2.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Thomas Lang; Adrian LeBlanc; Harlan Evans; Ying Lu; Harry Genant; Alice Yu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Longitudinal study of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, the forearm and the lower extremities after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; H H Bohr; O P Schaadt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.686

5.  Current trend and risk factors for kidney stones in persons with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Y Chen; M J DeVivo; J M Roseman
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Bone steady-state is established at reduced bone strength after spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).

Authors:  Angela Frotzler; Markus Berger; Hans Knecht; Prisca Eser
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Ulrich Hansen; Peter Zioupos; Rebecca Simpson; John D Currey; David Hynd
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Fracture rates and risk factors for fractures in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P Vestergaard; K Krogh; L Rejnmark; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Bone mineral loss at the proximal femur in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W B Edwards; T J Schnitzer; K L Troy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine and lower extremities years after spinal cord lesion.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; H Bohr; O Schaadt
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1988-10
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Bone Imaging and Fracture Risk after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Bone loss at the distal femur and proximal tibia in persons with spinal cord injury: imaging approaches, risk of fracture, and potential treatment options.

Authors:  C M Cirnigliaro; M J Myslinski; M F La Fountaine; S C Kirshblum; G F Forrest; W A Bauman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone architecture adaptations after spinal cord injury: impact of long-term vibration of a constrained lower limb.

Authors:  S Dudley-Javoroski; M A Petrie; C L McHenry; R E Amelon; P K Saha; R K Shields
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted rowing combined with zoledronic acid, but not alone, preserves distal femur strength and stiffness in people with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Y Fang; L R Morse; N Nguyen; R A Battaglino; R F Goldstein; K L Troy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Whole-body vibration can attenuate the deterioration of bone mass and trabecular bone microstructure in rats with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  A Minematsu; Y Nishii; H Imagita; D Takeshita; S Sakata
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Open-label clinical trial of alendronate after teriparatide therapy in people with spinal cord injury and low bone mineral density.

Authors:  Ifaz T Haider; Narina Simonian; Amanpreet S Saini; Frances M Leung; W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Proximal tibia fracture in a patient with incomplete spinal cord injury associated with robotic treadmill training.

Authors:  T R M Filippo; M C L De Carvalho; L B Carvalho; D R de Souza; M Imamura; L R Battistella
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 8.  Measurement of Bone: Diagnosis of SCI-Induced Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Karen L Troy; Leslie R Morse
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-16

9.  NGF-TrkA Signaling by Sensory Nerves Coordinates the Vascularization and Ossification of Developing Endochondral Bone.

Authors:  Ryan E Tomlinson; Zhi Li; Qian Zhang; Brian C Goh; Zhu Li; Daniel L J Thorek; Labchan Rajbhandari; Thomas M Brushart; Liliana Minichiello; Fengquan Zhou; Arun Venkatesan; Thomas L Clemens
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  The mechanical consequence of actual bone loss and simulated bone recovery in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W Brent Edwards; Thomas J Schnitzer; Karen L Troy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.