Literature DB >> 10490468

Secular change in long bone length and proportion in the United States, 1800-1970.

L M Jantz1, R L Jantz.   

Abstract

We examine secular change in long bone lengths and allometry of Americans dating from the mid-19th century to the 1970s. Skeletal samples were derived from the Huntington Collection, Terry Collection, World War II casualties, and the Forensic Anthropology Data Bank. Regression of bone length on year of birth allowed evaluation of the secular change in bone length. Size was computed as the geometric mean of all bone lengths, and shape as the ratio of each bone to size. These variables were then regressed on year of birth, allowing evaluation of allometric secular change. The results revealed a pattern of change that can be summarized as follows: male secular change is stronger than female, lower limb bone secular change is more pronounced than upper limb bone change, and distal bones change more than proximal bones, particularly in the lower limb. In males, white changes are uniformly higher than black but these differences do not rise to the level of statistical significance. Environmental forces, such as nutrition and disease, are the usual causes of secular changes in overall size. This paper shows that long bone proportions also respond to these same environmental factors. Moreover, the changes in body proportion are likely to be due to allometric consequences of growth changes that occur early in life. Am J Phys Anthropol 110:57-67, 1999. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10490468     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199909)110:1<57::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  22 in total

1.  The changing phenotype of the human species (affluent variety).

Authors:  E A M Gale
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Comments on "Estimation of stature from cranial sutures in a South Indian male population" by P. P. J. Rao et al.

Authors:  James Christopher Reed; Bridget F B Algee-Hewitt
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Temporal variations in basicranium dimorphism of North Indians.

Authors:  Vineeta Saini; Rashmi Srivastava; Satya Narayan Shamal; Tej Bali Singh; Vinod Kumar; Pramod Kumar; Sunil Kumar Tripathi
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Sitting height and sitting height/height ratio references for Turkish children.

Authors:  Rüveyde Bundak; Firdevs Bas; Andrzej Furman; Hülya Günöz; Feyza Darendeliler; Nurçin Saka; Sükran Poyrazoğlu; Olcay Neyzi
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greeks, Italians, and Spanish: forensic implications.

Authors:  Elena F Kranioti; Mario A Apostol
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia.

Authors:  Anežka Kotěrová; Jana Velemínská; Ján Dupej; Hana Brzobohatá; Aleš Pilný; Jaroslav Brůžek
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Educational review: measurement of GFR in special populations.

Authors:  Guido Filler; Misan Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  The use of biocultural data in interpreting sex differences in body proportions among rural Amazonians.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vercellotti; Barbara A Piperata
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 9.  Leg length, body proportion, and health: a review with a note on beauty.

Authors:  Barry Bogin; Maria Inês Varela-Silva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Longitudinal changes in femur bone mineral density after spinal cord injury: effects of slice placement and peel method.

Authors:  S Dudley-Javoroski; R K Shields
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.