Literature DB >> 28303327

Rotational error in path integration: encoding and execution errors in angle reproduction.

Elizabeth R Chrastil1,2, William H Warren3.   

Abstract

Path integration is fundamental to human navigation. When a navigator leaves home on a complex outbound path, they are able to keep track of their approximate position and orientation and return to their starting location on a direct homebound path. However, there are several sources of error during path integration. Previous research has focused almost exclusively on encoding error-the error in registering the outbound path in memory. Here, we also consider execution error-the error in the response, such as turning and walking a homebound trajectory. In two experiments conducted in ambulatory virtual environments, we examined the contribution of execution error to the rotational component of path integration using angle reproduction tasks. In the reproduction tasks, participants rotated once and then rotated again to face the original direction, either reproducing the initial turn or turning through the supplementary angle. One outstanding difficulty in disentangling encoding and execution error during a typical angle reproduction task is that as the encoding angle increases, so does the required response angle. In Experiment 1, we dissociated these two variables by asking participants to report each encoding angle using two different responses: by turning to walk on a path parallel to the initial facing direction in the same (reproduction) or opposite (supplementary angle) direction. In Experiment 2, participants reported the encoding angle by turning both rightward and leftward onto a path parallel to the initial facing direction, over a larger range of angles. The results suggest that execution error, not encoding error, is the predominant source of error in angular path integration. These findings also imply that the path integrator uses an intrinsic (action-scaled) rather than an extrinsic (objective) metric.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Idiothetic; Intrinsic metric; Navigation; Perception–action; Self-motion; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303327     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4910-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Idiosyncratic orientation strategies influence self-controlled whole-body rotations in the dark.

Authors:  I Siegler
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Spatial memory and path integration studied by self-driven passive linear displacement. I. Basic properties.

Authors:  I Israël; R Grasso; P Georges-Francois; T Tsuzuku; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual and vestibular factors influencing vestibular "navigation".

Authors:  I Israël; A M Bronstein; R Kanayama; M Faldon; M A Gresty
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?

Authors:  J A Thomson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task.

Authors:  Melissa J Kearns; William H Warren; Andrew P Duchon; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Homing in virtual environments: effects of field of view and path layout.

Authors:  P Péruch; M May; F Wartenberg
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The role of spatial memory and frames of reference in the precision of angular path integration.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; John W Philbeck; Nicholas J Kleene; David Chichka
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-08-09

9.  Does the human odometer use an extrinsic or intrinsic metric?

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement.

Authors:  I Israël; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction.

Authors:  Sevan K Harootonian; Arne D Ekstrom; Robert C Wilson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  The role of vision and proprioception in self-motion encoding: An immersive virtual reality study.

Authors:  Rena Bayramova; Irene Valori; Phoebe E McKenna-Plumley; Claudio Zandonella Callegher; Teresa Farroni
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.