Literature DB >> 19701630

EMG responses to unexpected perturbations are delayed in slower movements.

Fabian J David1, Cynthia Poon, Chuanxin M Niu, Daniel M Corcos, Mark B Shapiro.   

Abstract

It has previously been found that in fast point-to-point arm movements, proprioceptive feedback is centrally suppressed at the beginning of movement and is facilitated at a time that is correlated with temporal parameters of the planned movement. Here, we show that this correlation holds when subjects are explicitly instructed to move at less than maximal speed. We studied elbow flexion movements made at maximal speed and at 70% of maximal speed over a short distance against a light inertial load and over a long distance against a heavy inertial load. A small number of trials were unexpectedly perturbed by using a servo-controlled motor to decrease the movement velocity. The servo control was turned on early in the movement. The main novel finding is that responses in the surface EMG in the elbow muscles to the perturbation occurred later in the slow-speed conditions than fast-speed conditions. When viewed across all conditions, the onset of the EMG responses to the perturbation increased with the time to peak acceleration in unperturbed movements. In the inertial loaded movements, the time of peak acceleration coincides with the time of peak inertial torque, and so the observed correlation can be interpreted as reflecting the relation between either the planned movement kinematics or the planned movement dynamics. These results are compatible with a hypothesis that a descending command suppresses the proprioceptive feedback control at the movement onset and facilitates it at a time that depends on the time parameters of the planned movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701630      PMCID: PMC8190577          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1967-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  EMG responses to an unexpected load in fast movements are delayed with an increase in the expected movement time.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Gerald L Gottlieb; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex.

Authors:  T R Nichols; J C Houk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Chuanxin M Niu; Cynthia Poon; Fabian J David; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  One-trial adaptation of movement to changes in load.

Authors:  D L Weeks; M P Aubert; A G Feldman; M F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Common principles underlying the control of rapid, single degree-of-freedom movements at different joints.

Authors:  K D Pfann; D S Hoffman; G L Gottlieb; P L Strick; D M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  On the voluntary movement of compliant (inertial-viscoelastic) loads by parcellated control mechanisms.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. II. A speed-sensitive strategy.

Authors:  D M Corcos; G L Gottlieb; G C Agarwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Response to sudden torques about ankle in man. III. Suppression of stretch-evoked responses during phasic contraction.

Authors:  G L Gottlieb; G C Agarwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of unexpected perturbations on trajectories and EMG patterns of rapid wrist flexion movements in humans.

Authors:  R Hayashi; W J Becker; R G Lee
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  1 in total

1.  Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets.

Authors:  C Minos Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.