Literature DB >> 2769335

Organizing principles for single-joint movements. II. A speed-sensitive strategy.

D M Corcos1, G L Gottlieb, G C Agarwal.   

Abstract

1. Normal human subjects made discrete flexions of the elbow over a fixed distance in the horizontal plane from a stationary initial position to a visually defined target. We measured joint angle, acceleration, and electromyograms (EMGs) from two agonist and two antagonist muscles. 2. Changes in movement speed were elicited either by explicit instruction to the subject or by adjusting the target width. Instructions always required accurately stopping in the target zone. 3. Peak inertial torques and accelerations, movement times, and integrated EMGs were all highly correlated with speed. We show that inertial torque can be used as a linking variable that is almost sufficient to explain all correlations between the task, the EMG, and movement kinematics. 4. When subjects perform tasks that require control of movement speed, they adjust the rate at which torque is developed by the muscles. This rate is modulated by the way in which the muscles are activated. The rate at which joint torque develops is correlated with the rate at which the agonist EMG rises as well as with integrated EMG. 5. The antagonist EMG shows two components. The latency of the first is 30-50 ms and independent of movement dynamics. The latency of the second component is proportional to movement time. The rate of rise and area of both components scale with torque. 6. We propose organizing principles for the control of single-joint movements in which tasks are performed by one of two strategies. These are called speed-insensitive and speed-sensitive strategies. 7. A model is proposed in which movements made under a speed-sensitive strategy are executed by controlling the intensity of an excitation pulse delivered to the motoneuron pool. The effect is to regulate the rate at which joint torque, and consequently acceleration, increases. 8. Movements of variable distance, speed, accuracy, and load are shown to be controlled by one of two consistent sets of rules for muscle activation. These rules apply to the control of both the agonist and antagonist muscles. Rules of activation lead to distinguishable patterns of EMG and torque development. All observable changes in movement kinematics are explained as deterministic consequences of these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2769335     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Postural muscle activity during bilateral and unilateral arm movements at different speeds.

Authors:  G Mochizuki; T D Ivanova; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Muscle activation patterns in point-to-point and reversal movements in healthy, older subjects and in subjects with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  K D Pfann; J A Robichaud; G L Gottlieb; C L Comella; M Brandabur; D M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Initial conditions influence the characteristics of ballistic contractions in the ankle dorsiflexors.

Authors:  Chris Richartz; Morgan Lévénez; Julien Boucart; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Velocity-based planning of rapid elbow movements expands the control scheme of the equilibrium point hypothesis.

Authors:  Masataka Suzuki; Yoshihiko Yamazaki
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Modulation of anticipatory postural adjustments associated with unloading perturbation: effect of characteristics of a motor action.

Authors:  Takako Shiratori; Alexander Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Control of velocity and position in single joint movements.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints.

Authors:  Jacques Duchateau; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Drinking behavior and jaw muscle (EMG) activity in the pigeon (Columba livia).

Authors:  R Bout; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.