Literature DB >> 19700531

Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography Accuitomo tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques.

H Lund1, K Gröndahl, H-G Gröndahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy and precision of linear measurements, the influence of different object positions in cone beam CT (CBCT) images and the effect of different systems for reformatting and viewing the tomograms on measurement values.
METHODS: An object consisting of Plexiglas plates with metal spheres was radiographically examined in three positions using the CBCT unit Accuitomo. Tomograms were reformatted using the i-Dixel software and Sectra picture archiving and communication system (PACS) multiplanar reformatting (MPR). Two observers measured 20 linear distances in axial, frontal and sagittal planes. Physical measurements of actual distances by means of a digital caliper served as the gold standard.
RESULTS: For measurements performed on the Accuitomo and Sectra PACS workstations, the mean differences between repeated measurements were below 0.13 mm (standard deviation (SD) 0.13 mm) and 0.21 mm (SD 0.18 mm), respectively. Mean differences between the two observers were below 0.11 mm (SD 0.07 mm) and 0.15 mm (SD 0.09 mm). The mean difference between the gold standard and the basic position when using the Accuitomo workstation, was -0.08 mm (SD 0.21 mm) and for a deviated/rotated position -0.08 mm (SD 0.23 mm) and -0.09 mm (SD 0.20 mm). None was statistically significant (P > 0.05). For measurement performed on MPR tomograms using the Sectra PACS workstation, mean differences were -0.09 mm (SD 0.17 mm) for basic position, and -0.08 mm (SD 0.19 mm) and -0.13 mm (SD 0.15 mm) for deviated and rotated positions, respectively. The mean difference between gold standard and basic/rotated positions was statistically significant, with P = 0.032 and P = 0.002.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms previous findings indicating that measurements in 3DX Accuitomo FPD (flat panel detector) tomograms show a high level of agreement with actual distances. Our findings suggest the possibility of minor distortion in tomograms reformatted by means of Sectra PACS MPR.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19700531     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/15022357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  13 in total

1.  Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maria Nikiforidou; Lazaros Tsalikis; Christos Angelopoulos; Georgios Menexes; Ioannis Vouros; Antonios Konstantinides
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations.

Authors:  C Tomasi; E Bressan; B Corazza; S Mazzoleni; E Stellini; A Lith
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Francine Kühl Panzarella; J L C Junqueira; L B Oliveira; N S de Araújo; C Costa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparison of the accuracy of full head cone beam CT images obtained using a large field of view and stitched images.

Authors:  Mehmet Ozgur Ozemre; Ayse Gulsahi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Dongyun Wang; Andreas Künzel; Vladimir Golubovic; Ilya Mihatovic; Gordon John; Zhuofan Chen; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics?

Authors:  Daniela G Garib; Louise Resti Calil; Claudia Resende Leal; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

7.  Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Henrik Lund; Kerstin Gröndahl; Hans-Göran Gröndahl
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Sphenoid Sinus Pneumatization and Relationship with Neurovascular Structures.

Authors:  Najmeh Movahhedian; Maryam Paknahad; Fatemeh Abbasinia; Leila Khojatepour
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-01-14

9.  Cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of palatal displaced canine position: a methodological study.

Authors:  Julia Naoumova; Heidrun Kjellberg; Reet Palm
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Accuracy of linear measurements of galileos cone beam computed tomography in normal and different head positions.

Authors:  Mahnaz Sheikhi; Sajad Ghorbanizadeh; Mehrdad Abdinian; Hossein Goroohi; Hamid Badrian
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.