Literature DB >> 1969992

No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival.

A Nirapathpongporn1, D H Huber, J N Krieger.   

Abstract

No-scalpel vasectomy was developed to increase acceptability of vasectomy by elimination of the fear of the incision. Although this method has been used for over 8,000,000 men, the technique is largely unknown in developed countries. During the King's birthday vasectomy festival no-scalpel vasectomy was compared with standard incisional vasectomy in 1203 patients. An average of 57 procedures per day could be done by each physician with the no-scalpel method, compared to 33 procedures with the standard method (p less than 0.001). The complication rate was 0.4/100 procedures for no-scalpel vasectomy compared with 3.1/100 for standard vasectomy (p less than 0.001). No-scalpel vasectomy is a rapid and economic alternative to standard vasectomy, with fewer complications and increased patient acceptability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asia; Chemosterilants; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage; Delivery Of Health Care; Developing Countries; Family Planning; Health; Health Facilities; Male Sterilization; Method Acceptability; Mobile Health Units; Southeastern Asia; Sterilization, Sexual; Summary Report; Thailand; Vas Occlusion; Vasectomy

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1969992     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90487-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  12 in total

1.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY AND STANDARD INCISIONAL VASECTOMY.

Authors:  A S Sandhu; P R Kao
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

Review 2.  Contraception.

Authors:  A Szarewski; J Guillebaud
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-25

Review 3.  Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo; Laureen M Lopez; Huib A A M Van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

4.  Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary for no scalpel vasectomy.

Authors:  V Seenu; Abdul Hafiz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Trends in vasectomy. Analysis of one teaching practice.

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Huib A A M Van Vliet; Laureen M Lopez; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

7.  [Ambulatory vasectomy. Risks and complications].

Authors:  J Leissner; F Reiher; M Böhm; E P Allhoff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  The safety of vasectomy: recent concerns.

Authors:  T M Farley; O Meirik; S Mehta; G M Waites
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 9.  Male contraception.

Authors:  John K Amory
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Advances in male contraception.

Authors:  Stephanie T Page; John K Amory; William J Bremner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.