Literature DB >> 14513225

[Ambulatory vasectomy. Risks and complications].

J Leissner1, F Reiher, M Böhm, E P Allhoff.   

Abstract

Vasectomy is the simplest and most effective method of permanent sterilization in men. In most cases, the surgical technique includes conventional vasoresection with incision of the scrotal skin or no-scalpel vasectomy as a minimally invasive method. The most important complications following surgery are haemorrhage and haematoma (1.2%), infection (3.5%), epididymitis/epididymo-orchitis (2.1%), sperm granuloma (2-70%), and chronic pain (3-8%). No long-term negative organic effects have been proven in clinical studies. The surgeon's experience and the technique applied are essential for the postoperative course, whereas performing vasectomy either on an in-patient or out-patient basis does not seem to have an influence. To evaluate the success of the vasectomy, follow-up spermiograms are obligatory. If immotile spermatozoa are present further follow-ups are necessary. Vasectomy needs to be reperformed if motile spermatozoa are detected. The chance of an unsuccessful vasectomy is below 1%. Unprotected intercourse must not be performed before two consecutive spermiograms show azoospermia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513225     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-003-0402-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  25 in total

1.  Fournier's gangrene of the scrotum following day case vasectomy.

Authors:  A Patel; J W Ramsay; H N Whitfield
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Vasectomy.

Authors:  S S Schmidt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prevention of wound infection following vasectomy.

Authors:  P E Randall; L A Ganguli; M G Keaney; R W Marcuson
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1985-04

4.  Psychological long-term effects of sterilization on anxiety and depression.

Authors:  L Luo; S Z Wu; C Zhu; Q Fan; K Liu; G Sun
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Wound infection following vasectomy.

Authors:  P E Randall; L Ganguli; R W Marcuson
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1983-10

6.  Recanalization rate following methods of vasectomy using interposition of fascial sheath of vas deferens.

Authors:  J O Esho; A S Cass
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A long-term follow-up of 108 vasectomized men. Good counselling routines are important.

Authors:  B E Ehn; J Liljestrand
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1995-12

8.  Population-based outcomes after 28,246 in-hospital vasectomies and 1,902 vasovasostomies in Western Australia.

Authors:  C D Holman; Z S Wisniewski; J B Semmens; I L Rouse; A J Bass
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Vasectomy.

Authors:  W H Weiske
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.775

10.  A comparison of open-end versus closed-end vasectomies: a report on 6220 cases.

Authors:  W M Moss
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Ischemic testicular necrosis following vasectomy: rare and typical complications of an outpatient procedure].

Authors:  N Rolfes; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Antisepsis and genital hygiene in scrotal surgery: liability claims in the event of treatment errors.

Authors:  Peter Brühl
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2007-09-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.