Literature DB >> 9559195

Trends in vasectomy. Analysis of one teaching practice.

J L Reynolds1.   

Abstract

PROBLEM BEING ADDRESSED: How can a teaching practice develop a referral service and incorporate educational opportunities for family medicine residents, clinical clerks, and community family physicians? OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To develop a high-quality vasectomy service within a teaching practice to change the surgical procedure to the no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) technique; to educate family medicine residents, clinical clerks, and community family physicians about vasectomy and the NSV technique; and to monitor outcomes and compare them with published results. MAIN COMPONENTS OF PROGRAM: The program took place in an urban family medicine residency program. Data on number of procedures, types of patients choosing vasectomy, and outcomes are presented, along with information on number of learners who viewed, assisted with, or became competent to perform NSV.
CONCLUSIONS: A few family medicine residents and some interested community physicians could be trained to perform NSV competently. Involving learners in the procedure does not seem to change the rate of complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Canada; Developed Countries; Education; Family Planning; Male Sterilization; North America; Northern America; On-the-job Training; Sterilization, Sexual; Training Activities; Training Programs; Vas Ligation; Vasectomy

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9559195      PMCID: PMC2277692     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  16 in total

1.  Physician inquiry into spiritual matters.

Authors:  W S Strouse
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 2.  Sterilization.

Authors:  E W Wilson
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-04

Review 3.  Vas deferens occlusion during no-scalpel vasectomy.

Authors:  R D Reynolds
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 4.  Complications of vasectomy.

Authors:  R F Raspa
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 3.292

5.  Vasectomy by electrocautery: outcomes in a series of 2,500 patients.

Authors:  G C Denniston
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Open-ended vasectomy: approaching the ideal technique.

Authors:  G C Denniston; L Kuehl
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug

7.  The no-scalpel vasectomy.

Authors:  S Q Li; M Goldstein; J Zhu; D Huber
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A comparison of open-end versus closed-end vasectomies: a report on 6220 cases.

Authors:  W M Moss
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  A prospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men.

Authors:  E Giovannucci; A Ascherio; E B Rimm; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  No-scalpel vasectomy at the King's birthday vasectomy festival.

Authors:  A Nirapathpongporn; D H Huber; J N Krieger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Open dialogue on vasectomies.

Authors:  E Billinkoff
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.275

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.