Literature DB >> 19695698

Craniofacial vertical bone augmentation: a comparison between 3D printed monolithic monetite blocks and autologous onlay grafts in the rabbit.

Faleh Tamimi1, Jesus Torres, Uwe Gbureck, Enrique Lopez-Cabarcos, David C Bassett, Mohammad H Alkhraisat, Jake E Barralet.   

Abstract

Onlay autografting is amongst the most predictable techniques for craniofacial vertical bone augmentation, however, complications related to donor site surgery are common and synthetic alternatives to onlay autografts are desirable. Recent studies have shown that the acidic calcium phosphates, brushite and monetite, are osteoconductive, osteoinductive and resorb faster in vivo than hydroxyapatite. Moreover, they can be 3D printed allowing precise host bone-implant conformation. The objectives of this study were to confirm that craniofacial screw fixation of 3D printed monetite blocks was possible and to compare the resulting vertical bone augmentation with autograft. 3D printed monolithic monetite onlay implants were fixed with osteosynthesis screws on the calvarial bone surface of New Zealand rabbits. After 8 weeks, integration between the implant and the calvarial bone surface was observed in all cases. Histomorphometry revealed that 42% of the monetite was resorbed and that the new bone formed within the implant occupied 43% of its volume, sufficient for immediate dental implant placement. Bone tissue within the autologous onlay occupied 60% of the volume. We observed that patterns of regeneration within the implants differed throughout the material and propose that this was due to the anatomy and blood supply pattern in the region. Rapid prototyped monetite being resorbable osteoconductive and osteoinductive would appear to be a promising biomaterial for many bone regeneration strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19695698     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  29 in total

Review 1.  Applied Bioengineering in Tissue Reconstruction, Replacement, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Juan M Colazo; Brian C Evans; Angel F Farinas; Salam Al-Kassis; Craig L Duvall; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Different post-processing conditions for 3D bioprinted α-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds.

Authors:  Liciane Sabadin Bertol; Rodrigo Schabbach; Luis Alberto Loureiro Dos Santos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  3D printing in spine surgery.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Sapan D Gandhi; Matthew W Colman
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  Eggshell derived brushite bone cement with minimal inflammatory response and higher osteoconductive potential.

Authors:  R Jayasree; T S Sampath Kumar; R Venkateswari; Rakesh P Nankar; Mukesh Doble
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Drug release from calcium sulfate-based composites.

Authors:  Bryan R Orellana; J Zach Hilt; David A Puleo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 6.  Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses.

Authors:  Alpdogan Kantarci; Hatice Hasturk; Thomas E Van Dyke
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

7.  3D Printing for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Dylan Jack Richards; Yu Tan; Jia Jia; Hai Yao; Ying Mei
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Three dimensional printed calcium phosphate and poly(caprolactone) composites with improved mechanical properties and preserved microstructure.

Authors:  Joseph B Vella; Ryan P Trombetta; Michael D Hoffman; Jason Inzana; Hani Awad; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Structural changes and biological responsiveness of an injectable and mouldable monetite bone graft generated by a facile synthetic method.

Authors:  G Cama; B Gharibi; J C Knowles; S Romeed; L DiSilvio; S Deb
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Jason A Inzana; Diana Olvera; Seth M Fuller; James P Kelly; Olivia A Graeve; Edward M Schwarz; Stephen L Kates; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.