Literature DB >> 25297314

Structural changes and biological responsiveness of an injectable and mouldable monetite bone graft generated by a facile synthetic method.

G Cama1, B Gharibi1, J C Knowles2, S Romeed1, L DiSilvio1, S Deb3.   

Abstract

Brushite (dicalcium phosphate dihydrate) and monetite (dicalcium phosphate anhydrous) are of considerable interest in bone augmentation owing to their metastable nature in physiological fluids. The anhydrous form of brushite, namely monetite, has a finer microstructure with higher surface area, strength and bioresorbability, which does not transform to the poorly resorbable hydroxyapatite, thus making it a viable alternative for use as a scaffold for engineering of bone tissue. We recently reported the formation of monetite cements by a simple processing route without the need of hydrothermal treatment by using a high concentration of sodium chloride in the reaction mix of β-tricalcium phosphate and monocalcium phosphate monohydrate. In this paper, we report the biological responsiveness of monetite formed by this method. The in vitro behaviour of monetite after interaction and ageing both in an acellular and cellular environment showed that the crystalline phase of monetite was retained over three weeks as evidenced from X-ray diffraction measurements. The crystal size and morphology also remained unaltered after ageing in different media. Human osteoblast cells seeded on monetite showed the ability of the cells to proliferate and express genes associated with osteoblast maturation and mineralization. Furthermore, the results showed that monetite could stimulate osteoblasts to undergo osteogenesis and accelerate osteoblast maturation earlier than cells cultured on hydroxyapatite scaffolds of similar porosity. Osteoblasts cultured on monetite cement also showed higher expression of osteocalcin, which is an indicator of the maturation stages of osteoblastogenesis and is associated with matrix mineralization and bone forming activity of osteoblasts. Thus, this new method of fabricating porous monetite can be safely used for generating three-dimensional bone graft constructs.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone defects; bone substitute; monetite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25297314      PMCID: PMC4223900          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  22 in total

1.  In vitro structural changes in porous HA/beta-TCP scaffolds in simulated body fluid.

Authors:  S Sánchez-Salcedo; F Balas; I Izquierdo-Barba; M Vallet-Regí
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Cell therapy for bone regeneration--bench to bedside.

Authors:  Kevin Lee; Casey K Chan; Nilesh Patil; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Porous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds for bone substitute applications -- in vitro characterization.

Authors:  R M Pilliar; M J Filiaggi; J D Wells; M D Grynpas; R A Kandel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Biologically mediated resorption of brushite cement in vitro.

Authors:  Liam M Grover; Uwe Gbureck; Adrian J Wright; Maryjane Tremayne; Jake E Barralet
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Extracellular pH modulates the activity of cultured human osteoblasts.

Authors:  K K Kaysinger; W K Ramp
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  FTIR/ATR study of protein adsorption and brushite transformation to hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Clyde Riley; Mukesh Kumar; Krishnan Chittur
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  In vitro ageing of brushite calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  L M Grover; J C Knowles; G J P Fleming; J E Barralet
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Minimally invasive maxillofacial vertical bone augmentation using brushite based cements.

Authors:  Faleh Tamimi; Jesus Torres; Enrique Lopez-Cabarcos; David C Bassett; Pamela Habibovic; Elena Luceron; Jake E Barralet
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Cytocompatibility of brushite and monetite cell culture scaffolds made by three-dimensional powder printing.

Authors:  U Klammert; T Reuther; C Jahn; B Kraski; A C Kübler; U Gbureck
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Compositional changes of a dicalcium phosphate dihydrate cement after implantation in sheep.

Authors:  M Bohner; F Theiss; D Apelt; W Hirsiger; R Houriet; G Rizzoli; E Gnos; C Frei; J A Auer; B von Rechenberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  2 in total

1.  UMAOH Calcium Phosphate Coatings Designed for Drug Delivery: Vancomycin, 5-Fluorouracil, Interferon α-2b Case.

Authors:  Konstantin A Prosolov; Ekaterina G Komarova; Ekaterina A Kazantseva; Aleksandr S Lozhkomoev; Sergei O Kazantsev; Olga V Bakina; Marina V Mishina; Anastasia P Zima; Sergei V Krivoshchekov; Igor A Khlusov; Yurii P Sharkeev
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Comparison of the Morphological and Structural Characteristic of Bioresorbable and Biocompatible Hydroxyapatite-Loaded Biopolymer Composites.

Authors:  Monika Furko; Zsolt E Horváth; Judith Mihály; Katalin Balázsi; Csaba Balázsi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.076

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.