Literature DB >> 24529628

3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Jason A Inzana1, Diana Olvera2, Seth M Fuller3, James P Kelly4, Olivia A Graeve5, Edward M Schwarz6, Stephen L Kates7, Hani A Awad8.   

Abstract

Low temperature 3D printing of calcium phosphate scaffolds holds great promise for fabricating synthetic bone graft substitutes with enhanced performance over traditional techniques. Many design parameters, such as the binder solution properties, have yet to be optimized to ensure maximal biocompatibility and osteoconductivity with sufficient mechanical properties. This study tailored the phosphoric acid-based binder solution concentration to 8.75 wt% to maximize cytocompatibility and mechanical strength, with a supplementation of Tween 80 to improve printing. To further enhance the formulation, collagen was dissolved into the binder solution to fabricate collagen-calcium phosphate composites. Reducing the viscosity and surface tension through a physiologic heat treatment and Tween 80, respectively, enabled reliable thermal inkjet printing of the collagen solutions. Supplementing the binder solution with 1-2 wt% collagen significantly improved maximum flexural strength and cell viability. To assess the bone healing performance, we implanted 3D printed scaffolds into a critically sized murine femoral defect for 9 weeks. The implants were confirmed to be osteoconductive, with new bone growth incorporating the degrading scaffold materials. In conclusion, this study demonstrates optimization of material parameters for 3D printed calcium phosphate scaffolds and enhancement of material properties by volumetric collagen incorporation via inkjet printing.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; Calcium phosphate scaffold; Collagen; Three dimensional printing; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24529628      PMCID: PMC4065717          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  26 in total

Review 1.  Bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. A critical analysis.

Authors:  William G De Long; Thomas A Einhorn; Kenneth Koval; Michael McKee; Wade Smith; Roy Sanders; Tracy Watson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The morphology of anisotropic 3D-printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds.

Authors:  Fabienne C Fierz; Felix Beckmann; Marius Huser; Stephan H Irsen; Barbara Leukers; Frank Witte; Ozer Degistirici; Adrian Andronache; Michael Thie; Bert Müller
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Luminescence variations in hydroxyapatites doped with Eu2+ and Eu3+ ions.

Authors:  Olivia A Graeve; Raghunath Kanakala; Abhiram Madadi; Brandon C Williams; Katelyn C Glass
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Coating of biomaterial scaffolds with the collagen-mimetic peptide GFOGER for bone defect repair.

Authors:  Abigail M Wojtowicz; Asha Shekaran; Megan E Oest; Kenneth M Dupont; Kellie L Templeman; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Self-setting collagen-calcium phosphate bone cement: mechanical and cellular properties.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moreau; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Differences in matrix composition between calvaria and long bone in mice suggest differences in biomechanical properties and resorption: Special emphasis on collagen.

Authors:  T van den Bos; D Speijer; R A Bank; D Brömme; V Everts
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Craniofacial vertical bone augmentation: a comparison between 3D printed monolithic monetite blocks and autologous onlay grafts in the rabbit.

Authors:  Faleh Tamimi; Jesus Torres; Uwe Gbureck; Enrique Lopez-Cabarcos; David C Bassett; Mohammad H Alkhraisat; Jake E Barralet
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Brushite-collagen composites for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Faleh Tamimi; Balamurugan Kumarasami; Charles Doillon; Uwe Gbureck; Damien Le Nihouannen; Enrique Lopez Cabarcos; Jake E Barralet
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Cytocompatibility of brushite and monetite cell culture scaffolds made by three-dimensional powder printing.

Authors:  U Klammert; T Reuther; C Jahn; B Kraski; A C Kübler; U Gbureck
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Micro-computed tomography prediction of biomechanical strength in murine structural bone grafts.

Authors:  David G Reynolds; Colleen Hock; Saad Shaikh; Justin Jacobson; Xinping Zhang; Paul T Rubery; Christopher A Beck; Regis J O'keefe; Amy L Lerner; Edward M Schwarz; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  143 in total

1.  Editorial on the original article entitled "3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration" published in the Biomaterials on February 14, 2014.

Authors:  Lan Li; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

2.  Regeneration of a Pediatric Alveolar Cleft Model Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds and Osteogenic Agents: Comparison of Dipyridamole and rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Michael I Greenberg; Dean L Cuadrado; Audrey M Guarino; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Applied Bioengineering in Tissue Reconstruction, Replacement, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Juan M Colazo; Brian C Evans; Angel F Farinas; Salam Al-Kassis; Craig L Duvall; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Assembly of Layered Monetite-Chitosan Nanocomposite and Its Transition to Organized Hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Qichao Ruan; David Liberman; Yuzheng Zhang; Dongni Ren; Yunpeng Zhang; Steven Nutt; Janet Moradian-Oldak
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-05-24

5.  Four-Dimensional Printing Hierarchy Scaffolds with Highly Biocompatible Smart Polymers for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Shida Miao; Wei Zhu; Nathan J Castro; Jinsong Leng; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 6.  Biomaterials and Culture Systems for Development of Organoid and Organ-on-a-Chip Models.

Authors:  Katya D'Costa; Milena Kosic; Angus Lam; Azeen Moradipour; Yimu Zhao; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Self-Folding 3D Silk Biomaterial Rolls to Facilitate Axon and Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Yimin Huang; Vincent Fitzpatrick; Nan Zheng; Ran Cheng; Heyu Huang; Chiara Ghezzi; David L Kaplan; Chen Yang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Three-dimensional Printing of Multilayered Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Jason L Guo; Anthony Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 31.041

9.  Prevascularization of 3D printed bone scaffolds by bioactive hydrogels and cell co-culture.

Authors:  Mitchell A Kuss; Shaohua Wu; Ying Wang; Jason B Untrauer; Wenlong Li; Jung Yul Lim; Bin Duan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Bone Extracellular Matrix for Craniofacial Regeneration.

Authors:  Ben P Hung; Bilal A Naved; Ethan L Nyberg; Miguel Dias; Christina A Holmes; Jennifer H Elisseeff; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.