Literature DB >> 28916883

Different post-processing conditions for 3D bioprinted α-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds.

Liciane Sabadin Bertol1, Rodrigo Schabbach2, Luis Alberto Loureiro Dos Santos2.   

Abstract

The development of 3D printing hardware, software and materials has enabled the production of bone substitute scaffolds for tissue engineering. Calcium phosphates cements, such as those based on α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP), have recognized properties of osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity and resorbability and can be used to 3D print scaffolds to support and induce tissue formation and be replaced by natural bone. At present, however, the mechanical properties found for 3D printed bone scaffolds are only satisfactory for non-load bearing applications. This study varied the post-processing conditions of the 3D powder printing process of α-TCP cement scaffolds by either immersing the parts into binder, Ringer's solution or phosphoric acid, or by sintering in temperatures ranging from 800 to 1500 °C. The porosity, composition (phase changes), morphology, shrinkage and compressive strength were evaluated. The mechanical strength of the post-processed 3D printed scaffolds increased compared to the green parts and was in the range of the trabecular bone. Although the mechanical properties achieved are still low, the high porosity presented by the scaffolds can potentially result in greater bone ingrowth. The phases present in the scaffolds after the post-processing treatments were calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite, brushite, monetite, and unreacted α-TCP. Due to their chemical composition, the 3D printed scaffolds are expected to be resorbable, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916883     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-017-5989-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  27 in total

1.  Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing.

Authors:  Barbara Leukers; Hülya Gülkan; Stephan H Irsen; Stefan Milz; Carsten Tille; Matthias Schieker; Hermann Seitz
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Bone graft substitutes for articular support and metaphyseal comminution: what are the options?

Authors:  C Mauffrey; D Seligson; P Lichte; H C Pape; M Al-Rayyan
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Printability of calcium phosphate powders for three-dimensional printing of tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Andre Butscher; Marc Bohner; Christian Roth; Annika Ernstberger; Roman Heuberger; Nicola Doebelin; Philipp Rudolf von Rohr; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Setting reaction and hardening of an apatitic calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  M P Ginebra; E Fernández; E A De Maeyer; R M Verbeeck; M G Boltong; J Ginebra; F C Driessens; J A Planell
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Reconstruction of complex mandibular defects using integrated dental custom-made titanium implants.

Authors:  A Rachmiel; D Shilo; O Blanc; O Emodi
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 6.  Powder-based 3D printing for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  G Brunello; S Sivolella; R Meneghello; L Ferroni; C Gardin; A Piattelli; B Zavan; E Bressan
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 14.227

7.  3D powder printed calcium phosphate implants for reconstruction of cranial and maxillofacial defects.

Authors:  Uwe Klammert; Uwe Gbureck; Elke Vorndran; Jan Rödiger; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Alexander C Kübler
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  High early strength calcium phosphate bone cement: effects of dicalcium phosphate dihydrate and absorbable fibers.

Authors:  Elena F Burguera; Hockin H K Xu; Shozo Takagi; Laurence C Chow
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Sophie C Cox; John A Thornby; Gregory J Gibbons; Mark A Williams; Kajal K Mallick
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 7.328

10.  Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing.

Authors:  André Luiz Jardini; Maria Aparecida Larosa; Rubens Maciel Filho; Cecília Amélia de Carvalho Zavaglia; Luis Fernando Bernardes; Carlos Salles Lambert; Davi Reis Calderoni; Paulo Kharmandayan
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bioactive calcium silicate/poly-ε-caprolactone composite scaffolds 3D printed under mild conditions for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Yen-Hong Lin; Yung-Cheng Chiu; Yu-Fang Shen; Yuan-Haw Andrew Wu; Ming-You Shie
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  3D-printed titanium implant-coated polydopamine for repairing femoral condyle defects in rabbits.

Authors:  Weiyang Zhong; Jianxiao Li; Chenbo Hu; Zhengxue Quan; Dianming Jiang; Guangbin Huang; Zhigang Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.