Literature DB >> 19695273

Force-field adaptation without proprioception: can vision be used to model limb dynamics?

Fabrice R Sarlegna1, Nicole Malfait, Lionel Bringoux, Christophe Bourdin, Jean-Louis Vercher.   

Abstract

Because our environment and our body can change from time to time, the efficiency of human motor behavior relies on the updating of the neural processes transforming intentions into actions. Adaptation to the context critically depends on sensory feedback such as vision, touch or hearing. Although proprioception is not commonly listed as one of the main senses, its role is determinant for the coordination of daily gestures like goal-directed arm movements. In particular, previous work suggests that proprioceptive information is critical to update the internal representation of limb dynamic properties. Here, we examined the motor behavior of a deafferented patient, deprived of proprioception below the nose, to assess adaptation to new dynamic conditions in the absence of limb proprioception. The patient, and age-matched control participants, reached toward visual targets in a new force field created by a rotating platform. Full vision of the limb and workspace was available throughout the experiment. Although her impairment was obvious in baseline reaching performance, the proprioceptively deafferented patient clearly adapted to the new force conditions. In fact, her time course of adaptation was similar to that observed in controls. Moreover, when tested in the normal force field after adaptation to the new force field, the patient exhibited after-effects similar to those of controls. These findings show that motor adaptation to a modified force field is possible without proprioception and that vision can compensate for the permanent loss of proprioception to update the central representation of limb dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19695273     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  31 in total

1.  To transfer or not to transfer? Kinematics and laterality quotient predict interlimb transfer of motor learning.

Authors:  Hannah Z Lefumat; Jean-Louis Vercher; R Chris Miall; Jonathan Cole; Frank Buloup; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Case Studies in Neuroscience: The central and somatosensory contributions to finger interdependence and coordination: lessons from a study of a "deafferented person".

Authors:  Cristian Cuadra; Ali Falaki; Robert Sainburg; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  State dependence of adaptation of force output following movement observation.

Authors:  Paul A Wanda; Gang Li; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Proprioception in motor learning: lessons from a deafferented subject.

Authors:  N Yousif; J Cole; J Rothwell; J Diedrichsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transfer of dynamic motor skills acquired during isometric training to free motion.

Authors:  Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Michael Tan; Moria Fisher Bittmann; Etienne Burdet; James L Patton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Opposing force fields induce direction-specific sensorimotor adaptation but a non-specific perceptual shift consistent with a contraction of peripersonal space representation.

Authors:  Nicolas X Leclere; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Yann Coello; Christophe Bourdin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Highlights from the 2017 meeting of the Society for Neural Control of Movement (Dublin, Ireland).

Authors:  Juan Alvaro Gallego; Robert M Hardwick; Emily R Oby
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Promoting Translational Research Among Movement Science, Occupational Science, and Occupational Therapy.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sook-Lei Liew; Scott H Frey; Florence Clark
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  The influence of target sensory modality on motor planning may reflect errors in sensori-motor transformations.

Authors:  F R Sarlegna; A Przybyla; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.