Literature DB >> 28166469

Promoting Translational Research Among Movement Science, Occupational Science, and Occupational Therapy.

Robert L Sainburg1,2, Sook-Lei Liew3,4,5, Scott H Frey6, Florence Clark3.   

Abstract

Integration of research in the fields of neural control of movement and biomechanics (collectively referred to as movement science) with the field of human occupation directly benefits both areas of study. Specifically, incorporating many of the quantitative scientific methods and analyses employed in movement science can help accelerate the development of rehabilitation-relevant research in occupational therapy (OT) and occupational science (OS). Reciprocally, OT and OS, which focus on the performance of everyday activities (occupations) to promote health and well-being, provide theoretical frameworks to guide research on the performance of actions in the context of social, psychological, and environmental factors. Given both fields' mutual interest in the study of movement as it relates to health and disease, the authors posit that combining OS and OT theories and principles with the theories and methods in movement science may lead to new, impactful, and clinically relevant knowledge. The first step is to ensure that individuals with OS or OT backgrounds are academically prepared to pursue advanced study in movement science. In this article, the authors propose 2 strategies to address this need.

Entities:  

Keywords:  movement science; neural control of movement; neuroscience; occupational science; occupational therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28166469      PMCID: PMC6161828          DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1271299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  35 in total

Review 1.  Neuroscience and occupational therapy: vital connections. 1989 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture.

Authors:  S D Farber
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1989-10

2.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; M F Ghilardi; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  1978 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture: Toward a science of adaptive responses.

Authors:  L J King
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1978-08

4.  The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke.

Authors:  Binith Cheeran; Leonardo Cohen; Bruce Dobkin; Gary Ford; Richard Greenwood; David Howard; Masud Husain; Malcolm Macleod; Randolph Nudo; John Rothwell; Anthony Rudd; James Teo; Nicholas Ward; Steven Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Force-field adaptation without proprioception: can vision be used to model limb dynamics?

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Nicole Malfait; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Handedness can be explained by a serial hybrid control scheme.

Authors:  V Yadav; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  The sensations of everyday life: empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations.

Authors:  W Dunn
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

8.  Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention in promoting the well-being of independently living older people: results of the Well Elderly 2 Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Florence Clark; Jeanne Jackson; Mike Carlson; Chih-Ping Chou; Barbara J Cherry; Maryalice Jordan-Marsh; Bob G Knight; Deborah Mandel; Jeanine Blanchard; Douglas A Granger; Rand R Wilcox; Mei Ying Lai; Brett White; Joel Hay; Claudia Lam; Abbey Marterella; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

10.  Limb dominance results from asymmetries in predictive and impedance control mechanisms.

Authors:  Vivek Yadav; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.