Literature DB >> 25990821

Proprioception in motor learning: lessons from a deafferented subject.

N Yousif1, J Cole, J Rothwell, J Diedrichsen.   

Abstract

Proprioceptive information arises from a variety of channels, including muscle, tendon, and skin afferents. It tells us where our static limbs are in space and how they are moving. It remains unclear however, how these proprioceptive modes contribute to motor learning. Here, we studied a subject (IW) who has lost large myelinated fibres below the neck and found that he was strongly impaired in sensing the static position of his upper limbs, when passively moved to an unseen location. When making reaching movements however, his ability to discriminate in which direction the trajectory had been diverted was unimpaired. This dissociation allowed us to test the involvement of static and dynamic proprioception in motor learning. We found that IW showed a preserved ability to adapt to force fields when visual feedback was present. He was even sensitive to the exact form of the force perturbation, responding appropriately to a velocity- or position-dependent force after a single perturbation. The ability to adapt to force fields was also preserved when visual feedback about the lateral perturbation of the hand was withdrawn. In this experiment, however, he did not exhibit a form of use-dependent learning, which was evident in the control participants as a drift of the intended direction of the reaching movement in the perturbed direction. This suggests that this form of learning may depend on static position sense at the end of the movement. Our results indicate that dynamic and static proprioception play dissociable roles in motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990821     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4315-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Nerve endings in mammalian muscle.

Authors:  B H Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1933-04-13       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Unmyelinated tactile afferents underpin detection of low-force monofilaments.

Authors:  Jonathan Cole; M Catherine Bushnell; Francis McGlone; Mikael Elam; Yves Lamarre; Ake Vallbo; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation.

Authors:  S V Adamovich; M B Berkinblit; O Fookson; H Poizner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Dynamic response of human muscle spindle afferents to stretch.

Authors:  B B Edin; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  How each movement changes the next: an experimental and theoretical study of fast adaptive priors in reaching.

Authors:  Timothy Verstynen; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Olivier White; Darren Newman; Níall Lally
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; M F Ghilardi; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Rapid elbow flexion in the absence of proprioceptive and cutaneous feedback.

Authors:  R Forget; Y Lamarre
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1987

10.  Force-field adaptation without proprioception: can vision be used to model limb dynamics?

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Nicole Malfait; Lionel Bringoux; Christophe Bourdin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  15 in total

1.  The cerebellum contributes to proprioception during motion.

Authors:  Heidi M Weeks; Amanda S Therrien; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Divisively Normalized Integration of Multisensory Error Information Develops Motor Memories Specific to Vision and Proprioception.

Authors:  Takuji Hayashi; Yutaro Kato; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Initial information prior to movement onset influences kinematics of upward arm pointing movements.

Authors:  Célia Rousseau; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Jérémie Gaveau; Thierry Pozzo; Olivier White
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Sensorimotor recalibration during split-belt walking: task-specific and multisensory?

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Megan K O'Brien
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?

Authors:  Jens Bo Nielsen; Mark Schram Christensen; Simon Francis Farmer; Jakob Lorentzen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Elasticity improves handgrip performance and user experience during visuomotor control.

Authors:  Michael Mace; Paul Rinne; Jean-Luc Liardon; Catherine Uhomoibhi; Paul Bentley; Etienne Burdet
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Reliable and valid robot-assisted assessments of hand proprioceptive, motor and sensorimotor impairments after stroke.

Authors:  Monika Zbytniewska; Christoph M Kanzler; Lisa Jordan; Christian Salzmann; Joachim Liepert; Olivier Lambercy; Roger Gassert
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Proprioception Is Necessary for Body Schema Plasticity: Evidence from a Deafferented Patient.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Claudio Brozzoli; Jacques Luauté; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.

Authors:  R Chris Miall; Nick M Kitchen; Se-Ho Nam; Hannah Lefumat; Alix G Renault; Kristin Ørstavik; Jonathan D Cole; Fabrice R Sarlegna
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.