Literature DB >> 19694456

Discrimination of single base substitutions in a DNA strand immobilized in a biological nanopore.

Robert F Purnell1, Jacob J Schmidt.   

Abstract

Nanopores have been explored as highly sensitive sensors for detection and rapid sequencing of single molecules of DNA. To sequence DNA with a nanopore requires that adenine (A), cytosine (C), thymine (T), and guanine (G) produce distinct current signals as they traverse the pore. Recently, we demonstrated that homopolymers of adenine, cytosine, and thymine immobilized in the nanopore protein alpha-hemolysin (alphaHL) produced distinct current blockades dependent on their chemical orientation. To probe the detection limit of alphaHL, we examined immobilized single strands of T(40) DNA (polyT) with single base substitutions of A, C, and G at 12 positions on the strand occupying the stem region of alphaHL. We find blockade currents sensitive to base identity over most of these positions with the most sensitive region near the pore constriction. Adenine substitutions increase the measured blockade current to values intermediate to the polyT and polyA currents at a number of positions, while C substitutions increase the current to a level intermediate to polyT and polyC values in some positions, but decrease it below polyT in others. These changes in blockade current were also observed for G substitutions. These results indicate that total blockade currents measured in alphaHL arise from nucleotides at multiple locations and thus are not uniquely attributable to an individual base in a specific position, a finding consistent with a recently published study. The measurements of C and G substitutions also suggest that blockade current may be modulated through interactions between nucleotides and the pore interior at multiple sites in alphaHL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19694456     DOI: 10.1021/nn900441x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  43 in total

1.  Identification of epigenetic DNA modifications with a protein nanopore.

Authors:  Emma V B Wallace; David Stoddart; Andrew J Heron; Ellina Mikhailova; Giovanni Maglia; Timothy J Donohoe; Hagan Bayley
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Characterizing and controlling the motion of ssDNA in a solid-state nanopore.

Authors:  Binquan Luan; Glenn Martyna; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Applications of biological pores in nanomedicine, sensing, and nanoelectronics.

Authors:  Sheereen Majd; Erik C Yusko; Yazan N Billeh; Michael X Macrae; Jerry Yang; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Nanopore DNA sequencing with MspA.

Authors:  Ian M Derrington; Tom Z Butler; Marcus D Collins; Elizabeth Manrao; Mikhail Pavlenok; Michael Niederweis; Jens H Gundlach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nanopore-based identification of individual nucleotides for direct RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Mariam Ayub; Steven W Hardwick; Ben F Luisi; Hagan Bayley
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 6.  Controlling molecular transport through nanopores.

Authors:  Ulrich F Keyser
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Reading DNA at single-nucleotide resolution with a mutant MspA nanopore and phi29 DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Manrao; Ian M Derrington; Andrew H Laszlo; Kyle W Langford; Matthew K Hopper; Nathaniel Gillgren; Mikhail Pavlenok; Michael Niederweis; Jens H Gundlach
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Multiple base-recognition sites in a biological nanopore: two heads are better than one.

Authors:  David Stoddart; Giovanni Maglia; Ellina Mikhailova; Andrew J Heron; Hagan Bayley
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Base-excision repair activity of uracil-DNA glycosylase monitored using the latch zone of α-hemolysin.

Authors:  Qian Jin; Aaron M Fleming; Robert P Johnson; Yun Ding; Cynthia J Burrows; Henry S White
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Modulation of the current signatures of DNA abasic site adducts in the α-hemolysin ion channel.

Authors:  Na An; Henry S White; Cynthia J Burrows
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.