Literature DB >> 19687138

Testing for spatially divergent selection: comparing QST to FST.

Michael C Whitlock1, Frederic Guillaume.   

Abstract

Q(ST) is a standardized measure of the genetic differentiation of a quantitative trait among populations. The distribution of Q(ST)'s for neutral traits can be predicted from the F(ST) for neutral marker loci. To test for the neutral differentiation of a quantitative trait among populations, it is necessary to ask whether the Q(ST) of that trait is in the tail of the probability distribution of neutral traits. This neutral distribution can be estimated using the Lewontin-Krakauer distribution and the F(ST) from a relatively small number of marker loci. We develop a simulation method to test whether the Q(ST) of a given trait is consistent with the null hypothesis of selective neutrality over space. The method is most powerful with small mean F(ST), strong selection, and a large number (>10) of measured populations. The power and type I error rate of the new method are far superior to the traditional method of comparing Q(ST) and F(ST).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687138      PMCID: PMC2778959          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.099812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

Review 1.  Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation.

Authors:  M C Whitlock
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.

Authors:  Carlos López-Fanjul; Almudena Fernández; Miguel A Toro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on Q(ST), an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits.

Authors:  Jérôme Goudet; Lucie Büchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Nemo: an evolutionary and population genetics programming framework.

Authors:  Frédéric Guillaume; Jacques Rougemont
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Population structure and quantitative characters.

Authors:  A R Rogers; H C Harpending
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Under neutrality, Q(ST) < or = F(ST) when there is dominance in an island model.

Authors:  Jérôme Goudet; Guillaume Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Leinonen; R B O'Hara; J M Cano; J Merilä
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 8.  Evolutionary inference from QST.

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; J Krakauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  F statistics in Drosophila buzzatii: selection, population size and inbreeding.

Authors:  T Prout; J S Barker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  47 in total

1.  A new method to uncover signatures of divergent and stabilizing selection in quantitative traits.

Authors:  Otso Ovaskainen; Markku Karhunen; Chaozhi Zheng; José Manuel Cano Arias; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Effects of Demography and Genetics on the Neutral Distribution of Quantitative Traits.

Authors:  Evan M Koch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Tuomas Leinonen; R J Scott McCairns; Robert B O'Hara; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Local adaptation drives thermal tolerance among parasite populations: a common garden experiment.

Authors:  Elise Mazé-Guilmo; Simon Blanchet; Olivier Rey; Nicolas Canto; Géraldine Loot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Assessment of the potential role of natural selection in type 2 diabetes and related traits across human continental ancestry groups: comparison of phenotypic with genotypic divergence.

Authors:  Robert L Hanson; Cristopher V Van Hout; Wen-Chi Hsueh; Alan R Shuldiner; Sayuko Kobes; Madhumita Sinha; Leslie J Baier; William C Knowler
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Functional characterizations of venom phenotypes in the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus) and evidence for expression-driven divergence in toxic activities among populations.

Authors:  Mark J Margres; Robert Walls; Montamas Suntravat; Sara Lucena; Elda E Sánchez; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Natural variation in stomata size contributes to the local adaptation of water-use efficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Hannes Dittberner; Arthur Korte; Tabea Mettler-Altmann; Andreas P M Weber; Grey Monroe; Juliette de Meaux
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Contrasting the distribution of phenotypic and molecular variation in the freshwater snail Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors:  Y-N T Tian-Bi; P Jarne; J-N K Konan; J Utzinger; E K N'Goran
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Phenotypic divergence of the common toad (Bufo bufo) along an altitudinal gradient: evidence for local adaptation.

Authors:  E Luquet; J-P Léna; C Miaud; S Plénet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Nasal Structural and Aerodynamic Features That May Benefit Normal Olfactory Sensitivity.

Authors:  Chengyu Li; Jianbo Jiang; Kanghyun Kim; Bradley A Otto; Alexander A Farag; Beverly J Cowart; Edmund A Pribitkin; Pamela Dalton; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.