Literature DB >> 8514144

F statistics in Drosophila buzzatii: selection, population size and inbreeding.

T Prout1, J S Barker.   

Abstract

Drosophila buzzatii is confined to reproducing in a well defined patchy environment consisting of rotting cactus cladodes which are ephemeral, permitting at most three generations. Flies emerging from such rots were used to estimate the additive genetic variance within rots and the genetic variance between rots for body size and also were electrophoresed to determine their genotypes at six polymorphic loci. F statistics were estimated from body size and allozyme data. The FST derived from body size was significantly larger than the allozyme FST. It is proposed this is due to selective differentiation of body size. The allozyme FST is used to estimate effective population size: 10 < N < 50. It is suggested that the regularly observed positive FIS's could be due to partial sib mating, S. If so, the estimated lower bound is S = 0.258. Experiments are identified which could support or contradict these interpretations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8514144      PMCID: PMC1205439     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  2 in total

1.  Breeding structure of natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii: effects of the distribution of larval substrates.

Authors:  R H Thomas; J S Barker
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Temporal and microgeographic variation in allozyme frequencies in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  J S Barker; P D East; B S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  2 in total
  22 in total

1.  Testing for spatially divergent selection: comparing QST to FST.

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock; Frederic Guillaume
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Hardy-Weinberg testing for continuous data.

Authors:  L M McIntyre; B S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Detecting Adaptive Differentiation in Structured Populations with Genomic Data and Common Gardens.

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; Jeremy J Berg; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution.

Authors:  Amy L Dapper; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A comparison of population differentiation across four classes of gene marker in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James).

Authors:  R G Latta; J B Mitton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Population structure of morphological traits in Clarkia dudleyana. I. Comparison of FST between allozymes and morphological traits.

Authors:  R H Podolsky; T P Holtsford
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Heritability and selection on body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  A Leibowitz; M Santos; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic markers and quantitative genetic variation in Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae): a comparative analysis of population structure.

Authors:  I Bonnin; J M Prosperi; I Olivieri
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A comparison of isozyme and quantitative genetic variation in Pinus contorta ssp. latifolia by FST.

Authors:  R C Yang; F C Yeh; A D Yanchuk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.