Literature DB >> 19683156

Changes in vaulting and the effect on refraction after phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

Kazutaka Kamiya1, Kimiya Shimizu, Takushi Kawamorita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the changes in vaulting over time after implantable Collamer lens (ICL) implantation and the effect of vaulting on refraction.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated eyes of consecutive patients having ICL implantation. The postoperative changes in vaulting between the ICL and the crystalline at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year were quantitatively assessed. The relationship between the vaulting and refractive outcomes at 1 year was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Seventy-five eyes of 47 patients were evaluated. The mean vaulting was 0.61 mm +/- 0.26 (SD), 0.59 +/- 0.25 mm, 0.54 +/- 0.25 mm, and 0.53 +/- 0.24 mm at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. The mean refractive error (difference between attempted and achieved manifest spherical equivalent refraction) was 0.01 +/- 0.42 diopter (D) 1 year postoperatively. There was no significant association between the amount of vaulting and the refractive error (r = 0.19, P = .11).
CONCLUSIONS: Vaulting of the ICL over the crystalline lens decreased slightly with time, likely as a result of pupil movement, age-related increases in crystalline lens thickness, and the fixed position of the ICL haptics. The vaulting did not significantly affect refractive outcomes, suggesting that a precise effective lens position leads to higher predictability, largely as a result of the narrow fixated location of the ICL between the back surface of the iris and the ciliary sulcus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19683156     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Long-term evaluation of the central vault after phakic Collamer® lens (ICL) implantation using OCT.

Authors:  Jose F Alfonso; L Fernández-Vega; C Lisa; P Fernandes; J González-Meijome; R Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Three-year follow-up of subjective vault following myopic implantable collamer lens implantation.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Carlos Lisa; A Abdelhamid; Paulo Fernandes; Jorge Jorge; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation using the double-pass instrument.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Aya Saito; Akihito Igarashi; Hidenaga Kobashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Implantable collamer lens V4b and V4c for correction of high myopia.

Authors:  Vipul Bhandari; Smitha Karandikar; Jagdeesh K Reddy; Kirti Relekar
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-09

5.  Comparison of early changes in and factors affecting vault following posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation without and with a central hole (ICL V4 and ICL V4c).

Authors:  Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Rajeev Krishnan Naidu; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for moderate-to-high myopia: First experience in China.

Authors:  Xinfang Cao; Weiliang Wu; Yang Wang; Chen Xie; Jianping Tong; Ye Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Anterior Chamber Angle Evaluation following Phakic Posterior Chamber Collamer Lens with CentraFLOW and Its Correlation with ICL Vault and Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Sherif A Eissa; Sherin H Sadek; Mohamed W A El-Deeb
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Dynamic Assessment of Light-Induced Vaulting Changes of Implantable Collamer Lens With Central Port by Swept-Source OCT: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Felix Gonzalez-Lopez; Blas Mompean; Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig; Jorge Vila-Arteaga; Jaime Beltran; Julio Baviera
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Short-time evaluation on intraocular scattering after implantable collamer lens implantation for correcting high myopia.

Authors:  Zhe Yu; Jun Li; Hui Song
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Comparison of Visual, Refractive and Aberration Measurements of INTACS versus Toric ICL Lens Implantation; A Four-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Shahrokh Ramin; Azad Sangin Abadi; Farideh Doroodgar; Mehrdad Esmaeili; Faizollah Niazi; Sana Niazi; Cyrus Alinia; Yaser Golestani; Reza Taj Abadi
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.