Literature DB >> 19682790

Prostate-specific antigen velocity for early detection of prostate cancer: result from a large, representative, population-based cohort.

Andrew J Vickers1, Tineke Wolters, Caroline J Savage, Angel M Cronin, M Frank O'Brien, Kim Pettersson, Monique J Roobol, Gunnar Aus, Peter T Scardino, Jonas Hugosson, Fritz H Schröder, Hans Lilja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) over time (ie, PSA velocity [PSAV]) aid prostate cancer detection. Some guidelines do incorporate PSAV cut points as an indication for biopsy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether PSAV enhances prediction of biopsy outcome in a large, representative, population-based cohort. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: There were 2742 screening-arm participants with PSA <3 ng/ml at initial screening in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Rotterdam, Netherlands, or Göteborg, Sweden, and who were subsequently biopsied during rounds 2-6 due to elevated PSA. MEASUREMENTS: Total, free, and intact PSA and human kallikrein 2 were measured for 1-6 screening rounds at intervals of 2 or 4 yr. We created logistic regression models to predict prostate cancer based on age and PSA, with or without free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA). PSAV was added to each model and any enhancement in predictive accuracy assessed by area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PSAV led to small enhancements in predictive accuracy (AUC of 0.569 vs 0.531; 0.626 vs 0.609 if %fPSA was included), although not for high-grade disease. The enhancement depended on modeling a nonlinear relationship between PSAV and cancer. There was no benefit if we excluded men with higher velocities, which were associated with lower risk. These results apply to men in a screening program with elevated PSA; men with prior negative biopsy were not evaluated in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: In men with PSA of about ≥3 ng/ml, we found little justification for formal calculation of PSAV or for use of PSAV cut points to determine biopsy. Informal assessment of PSAV will likely aid clinical judgment, such as a sudden rise in PSA suggesting prostatitis, which could be further evaluated before biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19682790      PMCID: PMC2891354          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  26 in total

1.  Prostate specific antigen assay standardization bias could affect clinical decision making.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Daniel W Chan; Lori Sokoll; Donghui Kan; Jack Maggiore; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; Dana M Mondo; Chris R Griffin; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Reference reagents for prostate-specific antigen (PSA): establishment of the first international standards for free PSA and PSA (90:10)

Authors:  B Rafferty; P Rigsby; M Rose; T Stamey; R Gaines Das
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements of free and total prostate-specific antigen in serum vs plasma after long-term storage at -20 degrees C.

Authors:  David Ulmert; Charlotte Becker; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Timo Piironen; Thomas Björk; Jonas Hugosson; Göran Berglund; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM).

Authors:  M J Roobol; R Kranse; H J de Koning; F H Schröder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Is prostate-specific antigen velocity selective for clinically significant prostate cancer in screening? European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam).

Authors:  Tineke Wolters; Monique J Roobol; Chris H Bangma; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Prostate cancer: estimating the benefits of PSA screening.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Results of a randomized, population-based study of biennial screening using serum prostate-specific antigen measurement to detect prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Gunnar Aus; Hans Lilja; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustav Pihl
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Features and preliminary results of the Dutch centre of the ERSPC (Rotterdam, the Netherlands).

Authors:  M J Roobol; W J Kirkels; F H Schröder
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  25 in total

1.  Prostate specific antigen velocity does not aid prostate cancer detection in men with prior negative biopsy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Tineke Wolters; Caroline J Savage; Angel M Cronin; M Frank O'Brien; Monique J Roobol; Gunnar Aus; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  An examination of the dynamic changes in prostate-specific antigen occurring in a population-based cohort of men over time.

Authors:  Brant A Inman; Jingyu Zhang; Nilay D Shah; Brian T Denton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  The effects of type 2 diabetes and hypertension on changes in serum prostate specific antigen levels: results from the Olmsted County study.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Hal Morgenstern; Michaela E McGree; Debra J Jacobson; Jennifer L St Sauver; Steven J Jacobsen; Aruna V Sarma
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Interpretation of the prostate-specific antigen history in assessing life-threatening prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna E Kettermann; Luigi Ferrucci; Bruce J Trock; E Jeffrey Metter; Stacy Loeb; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Ratio of prostate specific antigen to the outer gland volume of prostrate as a predictor for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Min Zhang; Yang Yan; Fang Wang; Wen-Yu Gu; Guang-Hui Hu; Jun-Hua Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 6.  PSA Velocity in Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

7.  Sixteen-year longitudinal changes in serum prostate-specific antigen levels: the olmsted county study.

Authors:  Steven J Jacobsen; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Jennifer L St Sauver; George G Klee; Cynthia J Girman; Michael M Lieber
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Peter C Albertsen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  An empirical evaluation of guidelines on prostate-specific antigen velocity in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Cathee Till; Catherine M Tangen; Hans Lilja; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Counterpoint: Prostate-specific antigen velocity is not of value for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 11.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.