Literature DB >> 21350221

An empirical evaluation of guidelines on prostate-specific antigen velocity in prostate cancer detection.

Andrew J Vickers1, Cathee Till, Catherine M Tangen, Hans Lilja, Ian M Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association guidelines on early detection of prostate cancer recommend biopsy on the basis of high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity, even in the absence of other indications such as an elevated PSA or a positive digital rectal exam (DRE).
METHODS: To evaluate the current guideline, we compared the area under the curve of a multivariable model for prostate cancer including age, PSA, DRE, family history, and prior biopsy, with and without PSA velocity, in 5519 men undergoing biopsy, regardless of clinical indication, in the control arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. We also evaluated the clinical implications of using PSA velocity cut points to determine biopsy in men with low PSA and negative DRE in terms of additional cancers found and unnecessary biopsies conducted. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Incorporation of PSA velocity led to a very small increase in area under the curve from 0.702 to 0.709. Improvements in predictive accuracy were smaller for the endpoints of high-grade cancer (Gleason score of 7 or greater) and clinically significant cancer (Epstein criteria). Biopsying men with high PSA velocity but no other indication would lead to a large number of additional biopsies, with close to one in seven men being biopsied. PSA cut points with a comparable specificity to PSA velocity cut points had a higher sensitivity (23% vs 19%), particularly for high-grade (41% vs 25%) and clinically significant (32% vs 22%) disease. These findings were robust to the method of calculating PSA velocity.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the recommendation that men with high PSA velocity should be biopsied in the absence of other indications; this measure should not be included in practice guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350221      PMCID: PMC3057983          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  25 in total

1.  International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument.

Authors:  J S Burgers; B Fervers; M Haugh; M Brouwers; G Browman; T Philip; F A Cluzeau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection.

Authors:  Mark H Kawachi; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Barry; J Erik Busby; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; William J Catalona; Michael S Cookson; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Veda N Giri; George P Hemstreet; Richard J Howe; Paul H Lange; Hans Lilja; Kevin R Loughlin; James Mohler; Judd Moul; Robert B Nadler; Stephen G Patterson; Joseph C Presti; Antoinette M Stroup; Robert Wake; John T Wei
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Luigi Ferrucci; Anna Kettermann; Patricia Landis; E James Wright; Jonathan I Epstein; Bruce J Trock; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update.

Authors:  Kirsten L Greene; Peter C Albertsen; Richard J Babaian; H Ballentine Carter; Peter H Gann; Misop Han; Deborah Ann Kuban; A Oliver Sartor; Janet L Stanford; Anthony Zietman; Peter Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM).

Authors:  M J Roobol; R Kranse; H J de Koning; F H Schröder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Is prostate-specific antigen velocity selective for clinically significant prostate cancer in screening? European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam).

Authors:  Tineke Wolters; Monique J Roobol; Chris H Bangma; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Outcomes of localized prostate cancer following conservative management.

Authors:  Grace L Lu-Yao; Peter C Albertsen; Dirk F Moore; Weichung Shih; Yong Lin; Robert S DiPaola; Michael J Barry; Anthony Zietman; Michael O'Leary; Elizabeth Walker-Corkery; Siu-Long Yao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity and doubling time are associated with outcome but neither improves prediction of outcome beyond pretreatment PSA alone in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew Frank O'Brien; Angel M Cronin; Paul A Fearn; Brandon Smith; Jason Stasi; Bertrand Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Leslie G Ford; Michael M Lieber; R Duane Cespedes; James N Atkins; Scott M Lippman; Susie M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Connie M Szczepanek; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Implementation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

Authors:  Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; John J Crowley; Susan M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Charles A Coltman; Leslie G Ford; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-04
View more
  41 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening: facts, statistics, and interpretation in response to the US Preventive Services Task Force Review.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Andrew J Vickers; Monique Roobol; James Eastham; Peter Scardino; Hans Lilja; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prostate cancer: PSA velocity in prostate cancer screening--the debate continues.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity: a test of controversial benefit in the era of increased prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Should prostate-specific antigen velocity be abandoned?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  PSA velocity may not be of value in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Derrick Johnston; Martha K Terris
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population Health.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Ketan Badani; Daniel A Barocas; Glen W Barrisford; Jed-Sian Cheng; Arnold I Chin; Anthony Corcoran; Jonathan I Epstein; Arvin K George; Gopal N Gupta; Matthew H Hayn; Eric C Kauffman; Brian Lane; Michael A Liss; Moben Mirza; Todd M Morgan; Kelvin Moses; Kenneth G Nepple; Mark A Preston; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Matthew J Resnick; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Jonathan Silberstein; Eric A Singer; Geoffrey A Sonn; Preston Sprenkle; Kelly L Stratton; Jennifer Taylor; Jeffrey Tomaszewski; Matt Tollefson; Andrew Vickers; Wesley M White; William T Lowrance
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening: who and how?

Authors:  Allison S Glass; K Clint Cary; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  The use of multiphase nonlinear mixed models to define and quantify long-term changes in serum prostate-specific antigen: data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Azza Shoaibi; Gowtham A Rao; Bo Cai; John Rawl; James R Hébert
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Counterpoint: Prostate-specific antigen velocity is not of value for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 11.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.