Literature DB >> 15042673

Results of a randomized, population-based study of biennial screening using serum prostate-specific antigen measurement to detect prostate carcinoma.

Jonas Hugosson1, Gunnar Aus, Hans Lilja, Pär Lodding, Carl-Gustav Pihl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a prostate carcinoma screening program in which serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured.
METHODS: From a group of 20,000 men born between January 1, 1930, and December 31, 1944, 10,000 men were randomized into a screening group and 10,000 were randomized into a control group. Patients in the screening group were invited to undergo initial PSA testing between 1995 and 1996 and then were invited to receive testing every second year thereafter for 8 years (for a total of 4 PSA tests). Men with PSA levels > or =3 ng/mL (or > or =2.54 ng/mL, in the third and fourth screening rounds) were invited to undergo clinical investigation, which included sextant biopsy of the prostate. By linking to the regional cancer registry, the authors were able to obtain the true and expected incidence rates for the screening and control groups.
RESULTS: The screening participation rate was high (73%). A total of 884 malignancies have been detected to date, with 640 having been detected in the screening group. There was an early and marked shift toward more favorable disease stage and grade for malignancies detected on repeat screening. In the fourth screening round, only 2 of 82 detected malignancies were classified as advanced disease. Of the 227 screen-detected tumors on which surgery was performed, only 20 (8.8%) had small volume (<0.2 cm3). Forty-three interval malignancies were detected, but only five were accompanied by symptoms. At 8 years, the cumulative disease incidence rate among screening participants was 7.3%, compared with 2.4% in the control arm. The incidence rate observed in the screening population corresponds to the cumulative incidence rate observed in the Swedish male population at age 72 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Biennial PSA screening was very successful in diagnosing prostate carcinoma at an early stage, when curative treatment typically is effective. In addition, the results regarding interval malignancies were favorable. Thus, decreased mortality should be observed on long-term follow-up. The lead time associated with screening appears to fall within the range described in earlier studies involving frozen sera (i.e., 5-9 years). Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15042673     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Prostate specific antigen velocity does not aid prostate cancer detection in men with prior negative biopsy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Tineke Wolters; Caroline J Savage; Angel M Cronin; M Frank O'Brien; Monique J Roobol; Gunnar Aus; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Individualized screening interval for prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen level: results of a prospective, randomized, population-based study.

Authors:  Gunnar Aus; Jan-Erik Damber; Ali Khatami; Hans Lilja; Johan Stranne; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-12

3.  Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Racial differences in PSA screening interval and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Daniel L Howard; Yhenneko J Taylor; Louie E Ross; Sara E Wobker; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Prostate kallikrein markers in diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  David Ulmert; M Frank O'Brien; Anders S Bjartell; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Prostate-specific antigen screening in prostate cancer: perspectives on the evidence.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Peter T Scardino; Sigrid V Carlsson; Ethan Basch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  [Treatment errors involving diagnosis using prostate specific antigen. Decisions of the commission of experts for medical mistakes of treatment of the state medical board of North Rhine].

Authors:  V Lent; F Baumbusch; G Weber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Can one blood draw replace transrectal ultrasonography-estimated prostate volume to predict prostate cancer risk?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Mari T Peltola; Daniel Sjoberg; Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Racial disparities in prostate cancer survival in a screened population: Reality versus artifact.

Authors:  Dhamanpreet Kaur; Ernesto Ulloa-Pérez; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: longitudinal study.

Authors:  Benny Holmström; Mattias Johansson; Anders Bergh; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Göran Hallmans; Pär Stattin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.