Literature DB >> 21881887

Evaluation of methods for achieving stable INR in healthy subjects during a multiple-dose warfarin study.

Jill C Chappell1, Gemma Dickinson, Malcolm I Mitchell, Harry Haber, Yan Jin, Evelyn D Lobo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: No consistent method is available for finding stable warfarin maintenance doses and fast stabilization of international normalized ratio (INR) values among healthy subjects in experimental warfarin interaction studies. Using data from an earlier study that targeted a stable INR of 1.5-2.0 to test an interaction, we retrospectively evaluated potential dosing algorithms using all methods available to us to decrease the time needed for INR stabilization, which could be useful for future interaction studies in healthy subjects.
METHODS: Published pharmacogenetic and clinical dosing algorithms used to initiate pharmacotherapy with warfarin were applied, predicted doses and actual doses were compared by regression analysis, and concentration-time profiles of S-warfarin were simulated using SimCYP® software.
RESULTS: No demographic variables were significantly associated with time to reach a stable, low-intensity INR in this population of relatively young, healthy subjects. Predicted and actual doses were positively correlated for the pharmacogenetic algorithm, but not for the clinical algorithm. INR levels and S-warfarin concentrations were associated with CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Induction to a pharmacodynamic steady state for warfarin for future multiple-dose warfarin drug-interaction studies in healthy volunteers may be predicted using a pharmacogenetic-based dosing algorithm. Simulations revealed that the desired subtherapeutic INR level may be achieved by reducing the predicted dose by approximately 15%. Further study is needed to assess the applicability of this approach to decrease attrition rates and the time needed to reach INR stabilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21881887     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1114-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  21 in total

1.  CYP2C9 genotypes and dose requirements during the induction phase of oral anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Flora Peyvandi; Marta Spreafico; Simona Maria Siboni; Marco Moia; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Low intensity warfarin anticoagulation is safe and effective as a long-term venous thromboembolism prevention strategy.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  VKORC1 haplotypes and their impact on the inter-individual and inter-ethnical variability of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  Christof Geisen; Matthias Watzka; Katja Sittinger; Michael Steffens; Laurynas Daugela; Erhard Seifried; Clemens R Müller; Thomas F Wienker; Johannes Oldenburg
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Flexible induction dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose.

Authors:  A Fennerty; J Dolben; P Thomas; G Backhouse; D P Bentley; I A Campbell; P A Routledge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-04-28

5.  Genetic-based dosing in orthopedic patients beginning warfarin therapy.

Authors:  Eric A Millican; Petra A Lenzini; Paul E Milligan; Leonard Grosso; Charles Eby; Elena Deych; Gloria Grice; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; R Stephen J Burnett; Deepak Voora; Susan Gatchel; Amy Tiemeier; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Jack Ansell; Jack Hirsh; Leon Poller; Henry Bussey; Alan Jacobson; Elaine Hylek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  A polymorphism in the VKORC1 gene is associated with an interindividual variability in the dose-anticoagulant effect of warfarin.

Authors:  Giovanna D'Andrea; Rosa Lucia D'Ambrosio; Pasquale Di Perna; Massimiliano Chetta; Rosa Santacroce; Vincenzo Brancaccio; Elvira Grandone; Maurizio Margaglione
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Warfarin interactions with substances listed in drug information compendia and in the FDA-approved label for warfarin sodium.

Authors:  M Anthony; K Romero; D C Malone; L E Hines; L Higgins; R L Woosley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Warfarin: what are the clinical implications of an out-of-range-therapeutic international normalized ratio?

Authors:  Geno J Merli; George Tzanis
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data.

Authors:  T E Klein; R B Altman; N Eriksson; B F Gage; S E Kimmel; M-T M Lee; N A Limdi; D Page; D M Roden; M J Wagner; M D Caldwell; J A Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Warfarin dosage adjustment strategy in Chinese population.

Authors:  Zhe Yu; Ying-Long Ding; Fei Lu; Li-Yan Miao; Zhen-Ya Shen; Wen-Xue Ye
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.