Literature DB >> 22047153

Genotype-based dosing algorithms for warfarin therapy: data review and recommendations.

Eric G Johnson1, Benjamin D Horne, John F Carlquist, Jeffrey L Anderson.   

Abstract

Warfarin, the most common oral anticoagulant, is the ideal candidate for pharmacogenetic dosing and gene-based 'individualization' of care. A plethora of studies have shown that stable dose requirements can be predicted using sequence variants in the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes in both sexes and in different races. Multiple clinical trials of pharmacogenetic warfarin dosing have been conducted with various methods, including several randomized trials that have been completed. These studies have reported varying degrees of success and some have been met with substantial skepticism. Other much larger randomized trials are ongoing. This paper reviews and synthesizes the various clinical trials that have been published and touches on the potential that the ongoing trials offer. The emergence of new oral anticoagulants also raises the question of the relevance of pharmacogenetic warfarin dosing for the future. The cost of genotype-guided dosing is substantial, and none of the studies to date have shown a cost-benefit of using pharmacogenetic warfarin dosing in clinical practice. Although pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing has been discussed for many years, the currently available data regarding this genetically individualized dosing suggest that pharmacogenetics remains unproven for use in clinical warfarin prescription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22047153     DOI: 10.1007/bf03256417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  81 in total

1.  Genetic warfarin dosing: tables versus algorithms.

Authors:  Brian S Finkelman; Brian F Gage; Julie A Johnson; Colleen M Brensinger; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing.

Authors:  P Lenzini; M Wadelius; S Kimmel; J L Anderson; A L Jorgensen; M Pirmohamed; M D Caldwell; N Limdi; J K Burmester; M B Dowd; P Angchaisuksiri; A R Bass; J Chen; N Eriksson; A Rane; J D Lindh; J F Carlquist; B D Horne; G Grice; P E Milligan; C Eby; J Shin; H Kim; D Kurnik; C M Stein; G McMillin; R C Pendleton; R L Berg; P Deloukas; B F Gage
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  The long and winding road to warfarin pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Deepak Voora
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Genotypes of the cytochrome p450 isoform, CYP2C9, and the vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 conjointly determine stable warfarin dose: a prospective study.

Authors:  John F Carlquist; Benjamin D Horne; Joseph B Muhlestein; Donald L Lappé; Bryant M Whiting; Matthew J Kolek; Jessica L Clarke; Brent C James; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Relative contribution of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes and early INR response to the prediction of warfarin sensitivity during initiation of therapy.

Authors:  Chun Li; Ute I Schwarz; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; C Michael Stein; Daniel Kurnik
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Pharmacogenetic testing for warfarin dosing still awaits validation.

Authors:  Frank Lefevre; Steven N Goodman; Margaret A Piper
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events.

Authors:  Daniel S Budnitz; Daniel A Pollock; Kelly N Weidenbach; Aaron B Mendelsohn; Thomas J Schroeder; Joseph L Annest
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A prospective, randomized pilot trial of model-based warfarin dose initiation using CYP2C9 genotype and clinical data.

Authors:  Michael A Hillman; Russell A Wilke; Steven H Yale; Humberto J Vidaillet; Michael D Caldwell; Ingrid Glurich; Richard L Berg; John Schmelzer; James K Burmester
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-08

9.  An evaluation of nine genetic variants related to metabolism and mechanism of action of warfarin as applied to stable dose prediction.

Authors:  John F Carlquist; Benjamin D Horne; Chrissa Mower; James Park; John Huntinghouse; Jason T McKinney; Joseph B Muhlestein; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Laboratory and clinical outcomes of pharmacogenetic vs. clinical protocols for warfarin initiation in orthopedic patients.

Authors:  P A Lenzini; G R Grice; P E Milligan; M B Dowd; S Subherwal; E Deych; C S Eby; C R King; R M Porche-Sorbet; C V Murphy; R Marchand; E A Millican; R L Barrack; J C Clohisy; K Kronquist; S K Gatchel; B F Gage
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.824

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genetic advances in medicine: has the promise been fulfilled in general practice?

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Personalized medicine: is it a pharmacogenetic mirage?

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Devron R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Clopidogrel and warfarin pharmacogenetic tests: what is the evidence for use in clinical practice?

Authors:  Mohamed H A Shahin; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 4.  A review of a priori regression models for warfarin maintenance dose prediction.

Authors:  Ben Francis; Steven Lane; Munir Pirmohamed; Andrea Jorgensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.