Literature DB >> 19679146

Spatio-temporal tuning of coherent motion evoked responses in 4-6 month old infants and adults.

C Hou1, R O Gilmore, M W Pettet, A M Norcia.   

Abstract

Motion cues provide a rich source of information about translations of the observer through the environment as well as the movements of objects and surfaces. While the direction of motion can be extracted locally these local measurements are, in general, insufficient for determining object and surface motions. To study the development of local and global motion processing mechanisms, we recorded Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) in response to dynamic random dot displays that alternated between coherent rotational motion and random motion at 0.8 Hz. We compared the spatio-temporal tuning of the evoked response in 4-6 months old infants to that of adults by recording over a range of dot displacements and temporal update rates. Responses recorded at the frequency of the coherent motion modulation were tuned for displacement at the occipital midline in both adults in infants. Responses at lateral electrodes were tuned for speed in adults, but not in infants. Infant responses were maximal at a larger range of spatial displacement than that of adults. In contrast, responses recorded at the dot-update rate showed a more similar parametric displacement tuning and scalp topography in infants and adults. Taken together, our results suggest that while local motion processing is relatively mature at 4-6 months, global integration mechanisms exhibit significant immaturities at this age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19679146      PMCID: PMC3993004          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  58 in total

1.  Magnetic response of human extrastriate cortex in the detection of coherent and incoherent motion.

Authors:  K Lam; Y Kaneoke; A Gunji; H Yamasaki; E Matsumoto; T Naito; R Kakigi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain.

Authors:  O J Braddick; J M O'Brien; J Wattam-Bell; J Atkinson; R Turner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Opposite dependencies on visual motion coherence in human area MT+ and early visual cortex.

Authors:  Barbara Händel; Werner Lutzenberger; Peter Thier; Thomas Haarmeier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Representation of head-centric flow in the human motion complex.

Authors:  Jeroen Goossens; Sean P Dukelow; Ravi S Menon; Tutis Vilis; Albert V van den Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Development of the optokinetic system in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  C Distler; F Vital-Durand; R Korte; H Korbmacher; K P Hoffmann
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Infants' sensitivity to statistical distributions of motion direction and speed.

Authors:  T Banton; B I Bertenthal; J Seaks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Co-development of VEP motion response and binocular vision in normal infants and infantile esotropes.

Authors:  E E Birch; S Fawcett; D Stager
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Development of cortical responses to optic flow.

Authors:  Rick O Gilmore; C Hou; M W Pettet; A M Norcia
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Experience with moving visual stimuli drives the early development of cortical direction selectivity.

Authors:  Ye Li; Stephen D Van Hooser; Mark Mazurek; Leonard E White; David Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Distinct effects of attention on the neural responses to form and motion processing: a SSVEP source-imaging study.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Justin M Ales; Alex R Wade; Benoit R Cottereau; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Attentional dynamics of infant visual foraging.

Authors:  Steven S Robertson; Sarah Enos Watamura; Makeba Parramore Wilbourn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fast development of global motion processing in human infants.

Authors:  Emily J Blumenthal; Rain G Bosworth; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Asymmetric perception of radial expansion/contraction in Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) infants.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Tomoko Imura; Yuko Hattori; Ikuma Adachi; Shigeru Ichihara; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of blur on cortical responses to global form and motion.

Authors:  Eliza A Burton; John Wattam-Bell; Gary S Rubin; Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick; Marko Nardini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Development of sensitivity to global form and motion in macaque monkeys (Macaca nemestrina).

Authors:  Lynne Kiorpes; Tracy Price; Cynthia Hall-Haro; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Keep your eyes on development: the behavioral and neurophysiological development of visual mechanisms underlying form processing.

Authors:  C van den Boomen; M J van der Smagt; C Kemner
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Dynamics of absolute and relative disparity processing in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Milena Kaestner; Marissa L Evans; Yulan D Chen; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.400

9.  Children's Brain Responses to Optic Flow Vary by Pattern Type and Motion Speed.

Authors:  Rick O Gilmore; Amanda L Thomas; Jeremy Fesi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Averaging, not internal noise, limits the development of coherent motion processing.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Steven C Dakin; Marc S Tibber; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.