Literature DB >> 10771335

Magnetic response of human extrastriate cortex in the detection of coherent and incoherent motion.

K Lam1, Y Kaneoke, A Gunji, H Yamasaki, E Matsumoto, T Naito, R Kakigi.   

Abstract

Although direction selectivity is a cardinal property of neurons in the visual motion detection system, movement of numerous elements without global direction (incoherent motion) has been shown to activate human and monkey visual systems, as does coherent motion which has global direction. We used magnetoencephalography to investigate the neural process underlying responses to these types of motions in the human extrastriate cortex. Both motions were created using a random dot kinematogram and four speeds (0, 0.6, 9.6 and 25 degrees /s). The visual stimuli were composed of two successive motions at different speeds; a coherent motion at a certain speed that changed to incoherent motion at another speed or vice versa. Magnetic responses to the change in motion consisted of a few components, the first of which was always largest. The peak latency of the first component was inversely related to the speed of the preceding motion, but for both motions it was not affected by the speed of the subsequent motion. For each subject, the estimated origin of the first component was always in the extrastriate cortex, and this changed with the speed of the preceding motion. For both motions, the location for the slower preceding motion was lateral to that for the faster preceding motion. Although the latency changes of the two motions differed, their overall response properties were markedly similar. These findings show that the speed of incoherent motion is represented in the human extrastriate cortex neurons to the same degree as coherent motion. We consider that the human visual system has a distinct neural mechanism to perceive random dots' motion even though they do not move in a specific direction as a whole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10771335     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00037-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  10 in total

Review 1.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Magnocellular contributions to impaired motion processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Dongsoo Kim; Glenn Wylie; Roey Pasternak; Pamela D Butler; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Human visual motion areas determined individually by magnetoencephalography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Bundo; Y Kaneoke; S Inao; J Yoshida; A Nakamura; R Kakigi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual detection of motion speed in humans: spatiotemporal analysis by fMRI and MEG.

Authors:  Osamu Kawakami; Yoshiki Kaneoke; Koichi Maruyama; Ryusuke Kakigi; Tomohisa Okada; Norihiro Sadato; Yoshiharu Yonekura
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Directional Visual Motion Is Represented in the Auditory and Association Cortices of Early Deaf Individuals.

Authors:  Talia L Retter; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Spatio-temporal tuning of coherent motion evoked responses in 4-6 month old infants and adults.

Authors:  C Hou; R O Gilmore; M W Pettet; A M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  A review of human sensory dynamics for application to models of driver steering and speed control.

Authors:  Christopher J Nash; David J Cole; Robert S Bigler
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Differential orientation effect in the neural response to interacting biological motion of two agents.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirai; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.288

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.