Literature DB >> 18484841

Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Chuan Hou1, Mark W Pettet, Anthony M Norcia.   

Abstract

Coherent motion responses of patients with mild to moderate strabismic amblyopia were compared to those of normals using visual-evoked potentials (VEPs). Responses were elicited by dynamic random-dot kinematograms that alternated at 0.83 Hz between globally coherent (left-right) and incoherent (random) motion states. Tuning curves were measured at the first harmonic of the global motion update rate (0.83 Hz) and at the first harmonic of the dot update rate (20 Hz) for spatial displacements 3.1 to 27.9 arcmin (1.6 to 9.3 deg/s). Responses locked to the changes in the global organization of the local direction vectors were an inverted U-shaped function of displacement/speed in the normal-vision observers and in the fellow eyes of the strabismus patients while the tuning function of the amblyopic eyes was shifted to larger displacements/higher speeds. Responses at the dot update rate were reduced in amplitude and altered in timing in both eyes of the patients. The results are consistent with both local and global deficits in motion processing in strabismic amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484841      PMCID: PMC4386923          DOI: 10.1167/8.4.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  61 in total

1.  IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

Authors:  M R Nuwer; G Comi; R Emerson; A Fuglsang-Frederiksen; J M Guérit; H Hinrichs; A Ikeda; F J Luccas; P Rappelsberger
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Early discrimination of coherent versus incoherent motion by multiunit and synaptic activity in human putative MT+.

Authors:  I Ulbert; G Karmos; G Heit; E Halgren
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia.

Authors:  Anita J Simmers; Tim Ledgeway; Robert F Hess; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Opposite dependencies on visual motion coherence in human area MT+ and early visual cortex.

Authors:  Barbara Händel; Werner Lutzenberger; Peter Thier; Thomas Haarmeier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  High-frequency activity in human visual cortex is modulated by visual motion strength.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Visual processing in amblyopia: animal studies.

Authors:  Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2006-03

7.  Human visual motion areas determined individually by magnetoencephalography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Bundo; Y Kaneoke; S Inao; J Yoshida; A Nakamura; R Kakigi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Contour integration in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  R F Hess; R Demanins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia.

Authors:  D E Giaschi; D Regan; S P Kraft; X H Hong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Motion sensitivity and spatial undersampling in amblyopia.

Authors:  R F Hess; S J Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Acuity-independent effects of visual deprivation on human visual cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Early monocular defocus disrupts the normal development of receptive-field structure in V2 neurons of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Bin Zhang; Guofu Shen; Janice Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Shinji Nishimoto; Izumi Ohzawa; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Both saccadic and manual responses in the amblyopic eye of strabismics are irreducibly delayed.

Authors:  Christina Gambacorta; Jian Ding; Suzanne P McKee; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Connecting the dots: how local structure affects global integration in infants.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Mark Pettet; Vladimir Vildavski; Chuan Hou; Anthony Norcia
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Spatio-temporal tuning of coherent motion evoked responses in 4-6 month old infants and adults.

Authors:  C Hou; R O Gilmore; M W Pettet; A M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.

Authors:  Cathy O'Boyle; Sean I Chen; Julie-Anne Little
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Feature Counting Is Impaired When Shifting Attention Between the Eyes in Adults With Amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Gabriela Acevedo Munares
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Degraded attentional modulation of cortical neural populations in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Yee-Joon Kim; Xin Jie Lai; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.