Literature DB >> 10873810

Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain.

O J Braddick1, J M O'Brien, J Wattam-Bell, J Atkinson, R Turner.   

Abstract

There is much evidence in primates' visual processing for distinct mechanisms involved in object recognition and encoding object position and motion, which have been identified with 'ventral' and 'dorsal' streams, respectively, of the extra-striate visual areas [1] [2] [3]. This distinction may yield insights into normal human perception, its development and pathology. Motion coherence sensitivity has been taken as a test of global processing in the dorsal stream [4] [5]. We have proposed an analogous 'form coherence' measure of global processing in the ventral stream [6]. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, we found that the cortical regions activated by form coherence did not overlap with those activated by motion coherence in the same individuals. Areas differentially activated by form coherence included regions in the middle occipital gyrus, the ventral occipital surface, the intraparietal sulcus, and the temporal lobe. Motion coherence activated areas consistent with those previously identified as V5 and V3a, the ventral occipital surface, the intraparietal sulcus, and temporal structures. Neither form nor motion coherence activated area V1 differentially. Form and motion foci in occipital, parietal, and temporal areas were nearby but showed almost no overlap. These results support the idea that form and motion coherence test distinct functional brain systems, but that these do not necessarily correspond to a gross anatomical separation of dorsal and ventral processing streams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10873810     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00540-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  52 in total

1.  Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.

Authors:  E Macaluso; M Eimer; C D Frith; J Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Two stages in crossmodal saccadic integration: evidence from a visual-auditory focused attention task.

Authors:  Petra A Arndt; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Activity patterns in human motion-sensitive areas depend on the interpretation of global motion.

Authors:  Miguel Castelo-Branco; Elia Formisano; Walter Backes; Friedhelm Zanella; Sergio Neuenschwander; Wolf Singer; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Unravelling the development of the visual cortex: implications for plasticity and repair.

Authors:  James A Bourne
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Cerebral visual dysfunction in prematurely born children attending mainstream school.

Authors:  Catriona Macintyre-Béon; David Young; Gordon N Dutton; Kate Mitchell; Judith Simpson; Gunter Loffler; Richard Bowman; Ruth Hamilton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Decoding seen and attended motion directions from activity in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Yukiyasu Kamitani; Frank Tong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Comparison of form and motion coherence processing in autistic spectrum disorders and dyslexia.

Authors:  Stella Tsermentseli; Justin M O'Brien; Janine V Spencer
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-11-22

9.  Directional anisotropy of motion responses in retinotopic cortex.

Authors:  Mathijs Raemaekers; Martin J M Lankheet; Sanne Moorman; Zoe Kourtzi; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Retinotopically defined primary visual cortex in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Rosanna K Olsen; J Shane Kippenhan; Shruti Japee; Philip Kohn; Carolyn B Mervis; Ziad S Saad; Colleen A Morris; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.