Literature DB >> 19673212

Monte Carlo modeling of small photon fields: quantifying the impact of focal spot size on source occlusion and output factors, and exploring miniphantom design for small-field measurements.

Alison J D Scott1, Alan E Nahum, John D Fenwick.   

Abstract

The accuracy with which Monte Carlo models of photon beams generated by linear accelerators (linacs) can describe small-field dose distributions depends on the modeled width of the electron beam profile incident on the linac target. It is known that the electron focal spot width affects penumbra and cross-field profiles; here, the authors explore the extent to which source occlusion reduces linac output for smaller fields and larger spot sizes. A BEAMnrc Monte Carlo linac model has been used to investigate the variation in penumbra widths and small-field output factors with electron spot size. A formalism is developed separating head scatter factors into source occlusion and flattening filter factors. Differences between head scatter factors defined in terms of in-air energy fluence, collision kerma, and terma are explored using Monte Carlo calculations. Estimates of changes in kerma-based source occlusion and flattening filter factors with field size and focal spot width are obtained by calculating doses deposited in a narrow 2 mm wide virtual "milliphantom" geometry. The impact of focal spot size on phantom scatter is also explored. Modeled electron spot sizes of 0.4-0.7 mm FWHM generate acceptable matches to measured penumbra widths. However the 0.5 cm field output factor is quite sensitive to electron spot width, the measured output only being matched by calculations for a 0.7 mm spot width. Because the spectra of the unscattered primary (psi(pi)) and head-scattered (psi(sigma)) photon energy fluences differ, miniphantom-based collision kerma measurements do not scale precisely with total in-air energy fluence psi = (psi(pi) + psi(sigma) but with (psi(pi)+ 1.2psi(sigma)). For most field sizes, on-axis collision kerma is independent of the focal spot size; but for a 0.5 cm field size and 1.0 mm spot width, it is reduced by around 7% mostly due to source occlusion. The phantom scatter factor of the 0.5 cm field also shows some spot size dependence, decreasing by 6% (relative) as spot size is increased from 0.1 to 1.0 mm. The dependence of small-field source occlusion and output factors on the focal spot size makes this a significant factor in Monte Carlo modeling of small (< 1 cm) fields. Changes in penumbra width with spot size are not sufficiently large to accurately pinpoint spot widths. Consequently, while Monte Carlo models based exclusively on large-field data can quite accurately predict small-field profiles and PDDs, in the absence of experimental methods of determining incident electron beam profiles it will remain necessary to measure small-field output factors, fine-tuning modeled spot sizes to ensure good matching between the Monte Carlo and the measured output factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673212     DOI: 10.1118/1.3152866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Estimation of focal and extra-focal radiation profiles based on Gaussian modeling in medical linear accelerators.

Authors:  Shigeo Anai; Hidetaka Arimura; Katsumasa Nakamura; Fujio Araki; Takaomi Matsuki; Hideki Yoshikawa; Satoshi Yoshidome; Yoshiyuki Shioyama; Hiroshi Honda; Nobuo Ikeda
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-03-24

2.  Evaluation of beam modeling for small fields using a flattening filter-free beam.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Shuichi Ozawa; Takeo Nakashima; Masamichi Aita; Shintaro Tsuda; Yusuke Ochi; Takuro Okumura; Hirokazu Masuda; Yoshimi Ohno; Yuji Murakami; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-06-21

3.  Influence of Jaw Setting in the Determination of Stereotactic Small-Field Output Factors with Different Detectors.

Authors:  Seby George; Y Retna Ponmalar; Henry Finlay Godson; A Sathish Kumar; B Paul Ravindran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Deriving detector-specific correction factors for rectangular small fields using a scintillator detector.

Authors:  Yujiao Qin; Hualiang Zhong; Ning Wen; Karen Snyder; Yimei Huang; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric characteristics of the small diameter BrainLab™ cones used for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Gocha Khelashvili; James Chu; Aidnag Diaz; Julius Turian
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans.

Authors:  Ans C C Swinnen; Michel C Öllers; Erik Roijen; Sebastiaan M Nijsten; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator.

Authors:  Paula Monasor Denia; María Del Carmen Castellet García; Carla Manjón García; Juan David Quirós Higueras; Noelia de Marco Blancas; Jorge Bonaque Alandí; Xavier Jordi Juan Senabre; Agustín Santos Serra; Juan López-Tarjuelo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reconstruction of the electron source intensity distribution of a clinical linear accelerator using in-air measurements and a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Egor Borzov; Alexander Nevelsky; Raquel Bar-Deroma; Itzhak Orion
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-09

9.  The Radiological Physics Center's standard dataset for small field size output factors.

Authors:  David S Followill; Stephen F Kry; Lihong Qin; Jessica Lowenstein; Andrea Molineu; Paola Alvarez; Jose Francisco Aguirre; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  The impact of scanning data measurements on the Acuros dose calculation algorithm configuration.

Authors:  A Fogliata; E Esposito; L Paganini; G Reggiori; S Tomatis; M Scorsetti; L Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.