Literature DB >> 19670428

Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences.

Cara J Alexander1, Weronika M Crescini, Justin E Juskewitch, Nirusha Lachman, Wojciech Pawlina.   

Abstract

The goals of our study were to determine the predictive value and usability of an audience response system (ARS) as a knowledge assessment tool in an undergraduate medical curriculum. Over a three year period (2006-2008), data were collected from first year didactic blocks in Genetics/Histology and Anatomy/Radiology (n = 42-50 per class). During each block, students answered clinically oriented multiple choice questions using the ARS. Students' performances were recorded and cumulative ARS scores were compared with final examination performances. Correlation coefficients between these variables were calculated to assess the existence and direction of an association between ARS and final examination score. If associations existed, univariate models were then constructed using ARS as a predictor of final examination score. Student and faculty perception of ARS difficulty, usefulness, effect on performance, and preferred use were evaluated using a questionnaire. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ARS and final examination scores in all didactic blocks and predictive univariate models were constructed for each relationship (all P < 0.0001). Students and faculty agreed that ARS was easy to use and a reliable tool for providing real-time feedback that improved their performance and participation. In conclusion, we found ARS to be an effective assessment tool benefiting the faculty and the students in a curriculum focused on interaction and self-directed learning. 2009 American Association of Anatomists

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19670428      PMCID: PMC2802184          DOI: 10.1002/ase.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  16 in total

1.  From college to clinic: reasoning over memorization is key for understanding anatomy.

Authors:  Sue Ann Miller; William Perrotti; Dee U Silverthorn; Arthur F Dalley; Kyle E Rarey
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  2002-04-15

2.  Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors.

Authors:  Dejano T Sobral
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Johnson
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  A novel standard-compliant audience response system for medical education.

Authors:  Jonathan L Streeter; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.

Authors:  Jane E Caldwell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design.

Authors:  Maryfran Barber; David Njus
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.

Authors:  Lina Nayak; Joseph P Erinjeri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Education. Farewell, lecture?

Authors:  Eric Mazur
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Audience response systems: technology to engage learners.

Authors:  Jannette Collins
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Rules of engagement-12 tips for successful use of "clickers" in the classroom.

Authors:  Kalyani Premkumar; Cyril Coupal
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Motivating student learning using a formative assessment journey.

Authors:  Darrell J R Evans; Paul Zeun; Robert A Stanier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Use of remote response devices: an effective interactive method in the long- term learning.

Authors:  Maite Millor; Jon Etxano; Pedro Slon; Paula García-Barquín; Alberto Villanueva; Gorka Bastarrika; Jesús Ciro Pueyo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Audience response technology: engaging and empowering non-medical prescribing students in pharmacology learning.

Authors:  Joanne S Lymn; Alison Mostyn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Comparison of Active Learning Techniques: Audience Response Questions Versus Small Group Discussion on Immediate- and Long-term Knowledge Gain.

Authors:  Jaime Jordan; Babak Missaghi; Amy Douglass; Juliana Tolles
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-05-21

5.  Using Audience Response Technology to provide formative feedback on pharmacology performance for non-medical prescribing students--a preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  Alison Mostyn; Oonagh Meade; Joanne S Lymn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The educational value of an audience response system use in an Iraqi medical school.

Authors:  Faiz Tuma; Husam Majeed; John Blebea; Aussama Nassar; William C Durchholz; Susie Schofield
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  Use of elaborate feedback and an audience-response-system in dental education.

Authors:  Alexander Rahman; Silke Jacker-Guhr; Ingmar Staufenbiel; Karen Meyer; Michaela Zupanic; Merle Hahnemann; Anne-Katrin Lührs; Jörg Eberhard
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2013-08-15

8.  OnlineTED.com--a novel web-based audience response system for higher education. A pilot study to evaluate user acceptance.

Authors:  Felizian Kühbeck; Stefan Engelhardt; Antonio Sarikas
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2014-02-17

9.  Human structure in six and one-half weeks: one approach to providing foundational anatomical competency in an era of compressed medical school anatomy curricula.

Authors:  Nancy Halliday; Daniel O'Donoghue; Kathryn E Klump; Britta Thompson
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Pedagogical Approaches to Diagnostic Imaging Education: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kathleen L Linaker
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2015-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.