Literature DB >> 20368445

Epigenetic stability increases extensively during Drosophila follicle stem cell differentiation.

Andrew D Skora1, Allan C Spradling.   

Abstract

Stem and embryonic cells facilitate programming toward multiple daughter cell fates, whereas differentiated cells resist reprogramming and oncogenic transformation. How alterations in the chromatin-based machinery of epigenetic inheritance contribute to these differences remains poorly known. We observed random, heritable changes in GAL4/UAS transgene programming during Drosophila ovarian follicle stem cell differentiation and used them to measure the stage-specific epigenetic stability of gene programming. The frequency of GAL4/UAS reprogramming declines more than 100-fold over the nine divisions comprising this stem cell lineage. Stabilization acts in cis, suggesting that it is chromatin-based, and correlates with increased S phase length. Our results suggest that stem/early progenitor cells cannot accurately transmit nongenetic information to their progeny; full epigenetic competence is acquired only gradually during early differentiation. Modulating epigenetic inheritance may be a critical process controlling transitions between the pleuripotent and differentiated states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20368445      PMCID: PMC2867689          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1003180107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the GAL4/UAS system in Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  Lea A Goentoro; Nir Yakoby; Joseph Goodhouse; Trudi Schüpbach; Stanislav Y Shvartsman
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  CHANGES IN THE NUCLEI OF DIFFERENTIATING GASTRULA CELLS, AS DEMONSTRATED BY NUCLEAR TRANSPLANTATION.

Authors:  T J King; R Briggs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1955-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  To promote and protect: coordinating DNA replication and transcription for genome stability.

Authors:  Simon R V Knott; Christopher J Viggiani; Oscar M Aparicio
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 4.  Epigenetic dynamics of stem cells and cell lineage commitment: digging Waddington's canal.

Authors:  Myriam Hemberger; Wendy Dean; Wolf Reik
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Regulation of epithelial stem cell replacement and follicle formation in the Drosophila ovary.

Authors:  Todd Nystul; Allan Spradling
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mammalian (cytosine-5) methyltransferases cause genomic DNA methylation and lethality in Drosophila.

Authors:  F Lyko; B H Ramsahoye; H Kashevsky; M Tudor; M A Mastrangelo; T L Orr-Weaver; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hannah H Chang; Martin Hemberg; Mauricio Barahona; Donald E Ingber; Sui Huang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Bernardo Pando; Jeroen van Zon; Christopher J Lengner; Menno P Creyghton; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes.

Authors:  A H Brand; N Perrimon
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  The Drosophila heterochromatic gene encoding poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is required to modulate chromatin structure during development.

Authors:  Alexei Tulin; Dianne Stewart; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  30 in total

1.  Intercellular protein movement in syncytial Drosophila follicle cells.

Authors:  Stephanie J Airoldi; Peter F McLean; Yuko Shimada; Lynn Cooley
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Making big cells: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Brian R Calvi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Castor is required for Hedgehog-dependent cell-fate specification and follicle stem cell maintenance in Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  Yu-Chiuan Chang; Anna C-C Jang; Cheng-Han Lin; Denise J Montell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Drosophila models of epithelial stem cells and their niches.

Authors:  Pankaj Sahai-Hernandez; Angela Castanieto; Todd G Nystul
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.814

5.  Gene expression profiling identifies the zinc-finger protein Charlatan as a regulator of intestinal stem cells in Drosophila.

Authors:  Alla Amcheslavsky; Yingchao Nie; Qi Li; Feng He; Leo Tsuda; Michele Markstein; Y Tony Ip
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Bridging the divide: illuminating the path of intercellular exchange through ring canals.

Authors:  Peter F McLean; Lynn Cooley
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 7.  Chromatin features and the epigenetic regulation of pluripotency states in ESCs.

Authors:  Wee-Wei Tee; Danny Reinberg
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Novel cis-regulatory regions in ecdysone responsive genes are sufficient to promote gene expression in Drosophila ovarian cells.

Authors:  Samantha I McDonald; Allison N Beachum; Taylor D Hinnant; Amelia J Blake; Tierra Bynum; E Parris Hickman; Joseph Barnes; Kaely L Churchill; Tamesia S Roberts; Denise E Zangwill; Elizabeth T Ables
Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.224

9.  New slbo-Gal4 driver lines for the analysis of border cell migration during Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  Anna A Ogienko; Lyubov A Yarinich; Elena V Fedorova; Mikhail O Lebedev; Evgeniya N Andreyeva; Alexey V Pindyurin; Elina M Baricheva
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  The pros and cons of common actin labeling tools for visualizing actin dynamics during Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  Andrew J Spracklen; Tiffany N Fagan; Kaylee E Lovander; Tina L Tootle
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.