Literature DB >> 19661781

Lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer is dependent on many factors--the role of the tumor, the patient, the surgeon, the radiotherapist, and the pathologist.

Leonie J M Mekenkamp1, Johan H J M van Krieken, Corrie A M Marijnen, Cornelis J H van de Velde, Iris D Nagtegaal.   

Abstract

Lymph node status is the strongest prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer. There are several guidelines concerning the minimum numbers of lymph nodes that need to be examined to make reliable staging possible, but there is no consensus in the available literature. In this study, we determine in patients with rectal cancer factors that relate to the number of lymph nodes found and the presence of lymph node metastasis. In addition, the number of examined lymph nodes was correlated with prognosis. A total of 1227 patients were selected from a multicenter prospective randomized trial investigating the value of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The median number of examined lymph nodes in all patients was 7.0. The number of retrieved lymph nodes in patients with node metastasis was significantly higher than in node negative patients. After neoadjuvant radiotherapy fewer lymph nodes were retrieved (6.9 vs. 8.5; P<0.0001). Variations in lymph node yield between pathology laboratories and individual pathologists were striking. The following patient and tumor characteristics are associated with a significant lower lymph node retrieval: age over 60 years, overweight, small size, and low invasion depth of the tumor, poor differentiation grade, and absence of a lymphoid reaction. Node negative patients in whom seven or less lymph nodes were examined had a lower recurrence free interval than patients in whom at least 8 lymph nodes were examined (17.0% vs. 10.7%, P=0.016). We conclude that in pathology laboratories a median of at least 8 lymph nodes need to be examined in rectal cancer specimens, but that higher numbers are desirable and achievable in most cases, even after preoperative radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19661781     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b2e01f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  47 in total

Review 1.  Update on the surgical pathology standards on rectal cancer diagnosis, staging and quality assessment of surgery.

Authors:  Alejandro Rojo; Pilar Sancho; Oscar Alonso; Sara Encinas; Gemma Toledo; Juan F García
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Impact of fat obesity on laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: more reliable indicator than body mass index.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Song-Ee Baek; Taehyung Kim; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Joon Seok Lim; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colorectal cancer clinical management: the pathologists expert review.

Authors:  P Quirke; N P West; I D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Di Zhou; Ming Ye; Yongrui Bai; Ling Rong; Yanli Hou
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Occult tumor metastasis and the prognostic value of sentinel lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiutian Guo; Cun Wang; Xiao-Gang Shen; Si-Qin Ding; Yong-Yang Yu; Zong-Guang Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Lymph Node Harvest After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer and Its Impact on Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Rajkumar Billakanti; Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Srikanth Soma; Hemanth Makineni; Shirley Sundersingh
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-24

7.  Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Hype or Hope? (Indian Experience).

Authors:  S P Somashekhar; K R Ashwin; C Rohit Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  An appraisal of lymph node ratio in colon and rectal cancer: not one size fits all.

Authors:  M Medani; Niall Kelly; George Samaha; G Duff; Vourneen Healy; Elizabeth Mulcahy; Eoghan Condon; David Waldron; Jean Saunders; J Calvin Coffey
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Stratifies and Predicts Survival of High-Risk Individuals Among Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Christina W Lee; Katheryn H Wilkinson; Adam C Sheka; Glen E Leverson; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.