Literature DB >> 22740922

Occult tumor metastasis and the prognostic value of sentinel lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

Xiutian Guo1, Cun Wang, Xiao-Gang Shen, Si-Qin Ding, Yong-Yang Yu, Zong-Guang Zhou.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study to evaluate the application of sentinel lymph node (SLN) pathology in rectal cancer using ex vivo mapping and to investigate the incidence and prognostic value of occult SLN metastasis in routine node-negative specimens. Specimens (n=117) of rectal cancer were examined using a combination of routine pathology and ex vivo SLN mapping. The inspected SLNs were further treated with immunohistochemical staining for occult cancer foci. The log-rank test was used to assess survival. SLNs were examined in 112 of the included specimens with a total number of 212, resulting in an identification rate of 95.7% (112/117). The status of SLNs accurately reflected N stage in 93.8% (105/112) of cases and the sensitivity was 75.6% (31/41) in detecting nodal metastasis. The accuracy of SLN pathology decreased in cancers of more advanced TNM stages (P=0.001). In 74 cases with routine node-negative (N0) disease, SLN micrometastasis (MIC) and isolated tumor cells (ITC) were examined in 9 and 4 cases, while the remaining 61 were regarded as negative (NEG). The log-rank test revealed poorer disease-free and overall survival of the MIC group compared with the NEG group. However, the findings from the ITC group were not significant compared with those from the MIC and NEG groups. In conclusion, ex vivo SLN pathology is practical and accurate in rectal cancer; however, its utility is limited in cases of advanced disease. Immunohistochemically detected SLN micrometastasis in node-negative cases is therefore a predictor of poorer outcome, and may therefore be listed as a marker for adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22740922      PMCID: PMC3362382          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2011.490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  22 in total

1.  Mesorectal spread and micrometastasis of rectal cancer studied with large slice technique and tissue microarray.

Authors:  Cun Wang; Zong-Guang Zhou; Zhao Wang; Li Li; Yang-Chun Zheng; Gao-Ping Zhao; Dai-Yun Chen; Wei-Ping Liu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer: current status.

Authors:  Robbert J de Haas; Dennis A Wicherts; Monique G G Hobbelink; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Marguerite E I Schipper; Joke-Afke van der Zee; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Andrew K Stewart; Mark S Talamonti; David P Winchester; Thomas R Russell; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Ex vivo sentinel node mapping in carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  J H Wong; S Steineman; C Calderia; J Bowles; T Namiki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.

Authors:  D L Morton; D R Wen; J H Wong; J S Economou; L A Cagle; F K Storm; L J Foshag; A J Cochran
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-04

6.  Molecular staging of early colon cancer on the basis of sentinel node analysis: a multicenter phase II trial.

Authors:  A J Bilchik; S Saha; D Wiese; J A Stonecypher; T F Wood; S Sostrin; R R Turner; H J Wang; D L Morton; D S Hoon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Technical details of sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer and its impact on staging.

Authors:  S Saha; D Wiese; J Badin; T Beutler; D Nora; B K Ganatra; D Desai; S Kaushal; M Nagaraju; M Arora; T Singh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Lymph node negative colorectal cancers with isolated tumor deposits should be classified and treated as stage III.

Authors:  E J Th Belt; M F M van Stijn; H Bril; E S M de Lange-de Klerk; G A Meijer; S Meijer; H B A C Stockmann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Prognostic impact of micrometastases in colon cancer: interim results of a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Anton J Bilchik; Dave S B Hoon; Sukamal Saha; Roderick R Turner; David Wiese; Maggie DiNome; Kazuo Koyanagi; Martin McCarter; Perry Shen; Douglas Iddings; Steven L Chen; Maria Gonzalez; David Elashoff; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much?

Authors:  Sharlene Gill; Charles L Loprinzi; Daniel J Sargent; Stephan D Thomé; Steven R Alberts; Daniel G Haller; Jacqueline Benedetti; Guido Francini; Lois E Shepherd; Jean Francois Seitz; Roberto Labianca; Wei Chen; Stephen S Cha; Michael P Heldebrant; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.