MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to determine the value of changes in circulating tumour cell (CTC) levels prior to and after the first cycle of neoadjuvant treatment in early prediction of pathologic response in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Two blood samples were obtained from 72 eligible LABC patients to isolate and enumerate CTCs before neoadjuvant chemotherapy started on day 1, and on day 21, immediately before second cycle administration. RESULTS: Sixty patients (83.3%) had <1 CTC in the first sample and response rates in this cohort were pathologic complete response (PCR) in 2 patients (5%), partial response (PR) in 35 (87.5%), stable disease (SD) in 2 (5%) and progressive disease (PD) in 1 (2.5%). Twelve patients (16.7%) had >2 CTCs in the first sample; these patients were more likely to have triple negative tumours. All 12 had fewer CTCs in the second sample. Response rates in this second cohort of 12 patients were PCR in 4 (34%), PR in 6 (50%), SD in 1 (8%) and PD in 1 (8%). PCR rate was markedly better in this second cohort (p<0.0042; OR 14.5, 95% CI 2.3-92). DISCUSSION: This study suggests that the presence of CTCs prior to neoadjuvant therapy might be a predictor of response to this therapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to determine the value of changes in circulating tumour cell (CTC) levels prior to and after the first cycle of neoadjuvant treatment in early prediction of pathologic response in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Two blood samples were obtained from 72 eligible LABC patients to isolate and enumerate CTCs before neoadjuvant chemotherapy started on day 1, and on day 21, immediately before second cycle administration. RESULTS: Sixty patients (83.3%) had <1 CTC in the first sample and response rates in this cohort were pathologic complete response (PCR) in 2 patients (5%), partial response (PR) in 35 (87.5%), stable disease (SD) in 2 (5%) and progressive disease (PD) in 1 (2.5%). Twelve patients (16.7%) had >2 CTCs in the first sample; these patients were more likely to have triple negative tumours. All 12 had fewer CTCs in the second sample. Response rates in this second cohort of 12 patients were PCR in 4 (34%), PR in 6 (50%), SD in 1 (8%) and PD in 1 (8%). PCR rate was markedly better in this second cohort (p<0.0042; OR 14.5, 95% CI 2.3-92). DISCUSSION: This study suggests that the presence of CTCs prior to neoadjuvant therapy might be a predictor of response to this therapy.
Authors: W Jeffrey Allard; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; Madeline Repollet; Mark C Connelly; Chandra Rao; Arjan G J Tibbe; Jonathan W Uhr; Leon W M M Terstappen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; W Jeffrey Allard; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Nolé; E Munzone; L Zorzino; I Minchella; M Salvatici; E Botteri; M Medici; E Verri; L Adamoli; N Rotmensz; A Goldhirsch; M T Sandri Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Xia Li; Benoit M Dawant; E Brian Welch; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Ingrid Mayer; Mark Kelley; Ingrid Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: María José Serrano; Pedro Sánchez Rovira; I Martínez-Zubiaurre; Miguel Delgado Rodriguez; Mónica Fernández; Jose A Lorente Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 2.447