Literature DB >> 19660453

High frequency stimulation can block axonal conduction.

Alicia L Jensen1, Dominique M Durand.   

Abstract

High frequency stimulation (HFS) is used to control abnormal neuronal activity associated with movement, seizure, and psychiatric disorders. Yet, the mechanisms of its therapeutic action are not known. Although experimental results have shown that HFS suppresses somatic activity, other data has suggested that HFS could generate excitation of axons. Moreover it is unclear what effect the stimulation has on tissue surrounding the stimulation electrode. Electrophysiological and computational modeling literature suggests that HFS can drive axons at the stimulus frequency. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that unlike cell bodies, axons are driven by pulse train HFS. This hypothesis was tested in fibers of the hippocampus both in-vivo and in-vitro. Our results indicate that although electrical stimulation could activate and drive axons at low frequencies (0.5-25 Hz), as the stimulus frequency increased, electrical stimulation failed to continuously excite axonal activity. Fiber tracts were unable to follow extracellular pulse trains above 50 Hz in-vitro and above 125 Hz in-vivo. The number of cycles required for failure was frequency dependent but independent of stimulus amplitude. A novel in-vitro preparation was developed, in which, the alveus was isolated from the remainder of the hippocampus slice. The isolated fiber tract was unable to follow pulse trains above 75 Hz. Reversible conduction block occurred at much higher stimulus amplitudes, with pulse train HFS (>150 Hz) preventing propagation through the site of stimulation. This study shows that pulse train HFS affects axonal activity by: (1) disrupting HFS evoked excitation leading to partial conduction block of activity through the site of HFS; and (2) generating complete conduction block of secondary evoked activity, as HFS amplitude is increased. These results are relevant for the interpretation of the effects of HFS for the control of abnormal neural activity such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19660453      PMCID: PMC2761511          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  62 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Jonathan O Dostrovsky; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 10.338

2.  Suppression of axonal conduction by sinusoidal stimulation in rat hippocampus in vitro.

Authors:  A L Jensen; D M Durand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Cellular mechanisms preventing sustained activation of cortex during subcortical high-frequency stimulation.

Authors:  Karl J Iremonger; Trent R Anderson; Bin Hu; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Long-term outcome of bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation for primary cervical dystonia.

Authors:  S W Hung; C Hamani; A M Lozano; Y-Y W Poon; P Piboolnurak; J M Miyasaki; A E Lang; J O Dostrovsky; W D Hutchison; E Moro
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Electrical stimulation for epilepsy: stimulation of hippocampal foci.

Authors:  F Velasco; M Velasco; A L Velasco; D Menez; L Rocha
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation: excitation or inhibition.

Authors:  Jerrold L Vitek
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 10.338

7.  Cellular mechanisms underlying antiepileptic effects of low- and high-frequency electrical stimulation in acute epilepsy in neocortical brain slices in vitro.

Authors:  Yitzhak Schiller; Yael Bankirer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Deep brain stimulation in movement and psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  David E Hardesty; Harold A Sackeim
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Centromedian-thalamic and hippocampal electrical stimulation for the control of intractable epileptic seizures.

Authors:  M Velasco; F Velasco; A L Velasco
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Effects of extracellular potassium concentration on the excitability of the parallel fibres of the rat cerebellum.

Authors:  J D Kocsis; R C Malenka; S G Waxman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation for epilepsy: experimental approaches.

Authors:  John D Rolston; Sharanya Arcot Desai; Nealen G Laxpati; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  Separated interface nerve electrode prevents direct current induced nerve damage.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Excitation block in a nerve fibre model owing to potassium-dependent changes in myelin resistance.

Authors:  A R Brazhe; G V Maksimov; E Mosekilde; O V Sosnovtseva
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  From bed to bench side: Reverse translation to optimize neuromodulation for mood disorders.

Authors:  Peter H Rudebeck; Erin L Rich; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Differential fiber-specific block of nerve conduction in mammalian peripheral nerves using kilohertz electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Yogi A Patel; Robert J Butera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Fidelity of frequency and phase entrainment of circuit-level spike activity during DBS.

Authors:  Filippo Agnesi; Abirami Muralidharan; Kenneth B Baker; Jerrold L Vitek; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Current Status of Neuromodulatory Therapies for Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Xia; Yi Yang; Yongkun Guo; Yang Bai; Yuanyuan Dang; Ruxiang Xu; Jianghong He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.203

8.  High frequency stimulation can suppress globally seizures induced by 4-AP in the rat hippocampus: an acute in vivo study.

Authors:  Chia-Chu Chiang; Chou-Ching K Lin; Ming-Shaung Ju; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  High frequency stimulation extends the refractory period and generates axonal block in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Zhouyan Feng; Ying Yu; Zheshan Guo; Jiayue Cao; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Functional disconnection of axonal fibers generated by high frequency stimulation in the hippocampal CA1 region in-vivo.

Authors:  Zhouyan Feng; Xiaojing Zheng; Ying Yu; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.